Regulski Matthew, Myntti Matthew F, James Garth A
Wound Care Institute of Ocean County, 54 Bey Lea Road, Toms River, NJ 08753, USA.
Next Science® LLC, 10550 Deerwood Park Blvd, Suite 300, Jacksonville, FL 32256, USA.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;12(3):536. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030536.
Considering the prevalence and pathogenicity of biofilms in wounds, this study was designed to evaluate the anti-biofilm capabilities of eight commercially available wound care products using established in vitro assays for biofilms. The products evaluated included dressings with multiple delivery formats for ionic silver including nanocrystalline, gelling fibers, polyurethane (PU) foam, and polymer matrix. Additionally, non-silver-based products including an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)-dissolving antimicrobial wound gel (BDWG), a collagenase-based debriding ointment and a fish skin-based skin substitute were also evaluated. The products were evaluated on and mixed-species biofilms grown using colony drip flow reactor (CDFR) and standard drip flow reactor (DFR) methodologies. Anti-biofilm efficacy was measured by viable plate counts and confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM). Four of the eight wound care products tested were efficacious in inhibiting growth of new biofilm when compared with untreated controls. These four products were further evaluated against mature biofilms. BDWG was the only product that achieved greater than 2-log growth reduction (5.88 and 6.58 for and , respectively) of a mature biofilm. Evaluating both biofilm prevention and mature biofilm disruption capacity is important to a comprehensive understanding of the anti-biofilm efficacy of wound care products.
考虑到生物膜在伤口中的患病率和致病性,本研究旨在使用已建立的生物膜体外检测方法,评估八种市售伤口护理产品的抗生物膜能力。所评估的产品包括多种离子银递送形式的敷料,如纳米晶、凝胶纤维、聚氨酯(PU)泡沫和聚合物基质。此外,还评估了非银基产品,包括一种细胞外聚合物物质(EPS)溶解抗菌伤口凝胶(BDWG)、一种基于胶原酶的清创软膏和一种基于鱼皮的皮肤替代品。这些产品在使用菌落滴流反应器(CDFR)和标准滴流反应器(DFR)方法培养的单一菌种和混合菌种生物膜上进行评估。通过活菌平板计数和共聚焦扫描激光显微镜(CSLM)测量抗生物膜功效。与未处理的对照相比,所测试的八种伤口护理产品中有四种在抑制新生物膜生长方面有效。这四种产品进一步针对成熟生物膜进行评估。BDWG是唯一一种对成熟生物膜实现大于2个对数级生长减少(单一菌种和混合菌种生物膜分别为5.88和6.58)的产品。评估生物膜预防和成熟生物膜破坏能力对于全面了解伤口护理产品的抗生物膜功效很重要。