Miller Matthew M, Rubaiyat Abu Hasnat Mohammad, Rohde Gustavo K
Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St., Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, 415 Lane Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1129. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061129.
We sought to develop new quantitative approaches to characterize the spatial distribution of mammographic density and contrast enhancement of suspicious contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) findings to improve malignant vs. benign classifications of breast lesions. We retrospectively analyzed all breast lesions that underwent CEM imaging and tissue sampling at our institution from 2014-2020 in this IRB-approved study. A penalized linear discriminant analysis was used to classify lesions based on the averaged histograms of radial distributions of mammographic density and contrast enhancement. T-tests were used to compare the classification accuracies of density, contrast, and concatenated density and contrast histograms. Logistic regression and AUC-ROC analyses were used to assess if adding demographic and clinical data improved the model accuracy. A total of 159 suspicious findings were evaluated. Density histograms were more accurate in classifying lesions as malignant or benign than a random classifier (62.37% vs. 48%; < 0.001), but the concatenated density and contrast histograms demonstrated a higher accuracy (71.25%; < 0.001) than the density histograms alone. Including the demographic and clinical data in our models led to a higher AUC-ROC than concatenated density and contrast images (0.81 vs. 0.70; < 0.001). In the classification of invasive vs. non-invasive malignancy, the concatenated density and contrast histograms demonstrated no significant improvement in accuracy over the density histograms alone (77.63% vs. 78.59%; = 0.504). Our findings suggest that quantitative differences in the radial distribution of mammographic density could be used to discriminate malignant from benign breast findings; however, classification accuracy was significantly improved with the addition of contrast-enhanced imaging data from CEM. Adding patient demographic and clinical information further improved the classification accuracy.
我们试图开发新的定量方法,以表征乳腺钼靶密度的空间分布以及可疑对比增强乳腺钼靶(CEM)检查结果的对比增强情况,从而改善乳腺病变的良恶性分类。在这项经机构审查委员会批准的研究中,我们回顾性分析了2014年至2020年在本机构接受CEM成像和组织采样的所有乳腺病变。采用惩罚线性判别分析,根据乳腺钼靶密度和对比增强的径向分布平均直方图对病变进行分类。使用t检验比较密度、对比度以及密度与对比度联合直方图的分类准确性。采用逻辑回归和AUC-ROC分析评估添加人口统计学和临床数据是否能提高模型准确性。共评估了159个可疑结果。密度直方图在将病变分类为恶性或良性方面比随机分类器更准确(62.37%对48%;<0.001),但密度与对比度联合直方图显示出比单独的密度直方图更高的准确性(71.25%;<0.001)。在我们的模型中纳入人口统计学和临床数据导致AUC-ROC高于密度与对比度联合图像(0.81对0.70;<0.001)。在浸润性与非浸润性恶性肿瘤的分类中,密度与对比度联合直方图在准确性上相比单独的密度直方图没有显著提高(77.63%对78.59%;=0.504)。我们的研究结果表明,乳腺钼靶密度径向分布的定量差异可用于区分乳腺良恶性病变;然而,添加CEM的对比增强成像数据可显著提高分类准确性。添加患者人口统计学和临床信息进一步提高了分类准确性。