Kong Fangfang, Pan Guangsen, Du Chengrun, Hu Chaosu, Ying Hongmei
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 9;15(6):1689. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061689.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy (IC) plus radiotherapy (RT) and IC plus concurrent or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT/AC) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with negative Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) after IC. A total of 547 NPC patients with negative plasma EBV DNA post-IC were included. Patients were classified into the IC + RT group and the IC + CCRT/AC group. Locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the variables. The median follow-up time was 37 months. The 3-year LRFS, DMFS, OS, and PFS rates for the whole group were 92.2%, 92.4%, 96.4%, and 84.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in LRFS, DMFS, OS, and PFS between the IC + RT and the IC + CCRT/AC groups, both before PSM (3-year rates of 91.1% vs. 92.6%, = 0.94; 95.6% vs. 91.5%, = 0.08; 95.2% vs. 96.8%, = 0.80; 85.9% vs. 84.0%, = 0.38) and after PSM (90.7% vs. 92.7%, = 0.77; 96.8% vs. 93.7%, = 0.29; 94.5% vs. 93.9%, = 0.57; 84.7% vs. 85.6%, = 0.96). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the treatment schedule was not an independent predictor for survival rates. Patients in the IC + RT group had fewer treatment-related acute toxicities and better tolerance. IC + RT displayed similar survival outcomes as IC + CCRT/AC for NPC patients with negative post-IC EBV DNA.
本研究的目的是比较诱导化疗(IC)联合放疗(RT)与IC联合同步或辅助放化疗(CCRT/AC)对诱导化疗后爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒DNA(EBV DNA)阴性的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的疗效和毒性。共纳入547例诱导化疗后血浆EBV DNA阴性的NPC患者。患者被分为IC + RT组和IC + CCRT/AC组。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计并比较局部区域无复发生存率(LRFS)、远处转移无复发生存率(DMFS)、总生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS)。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡变量。中位随访时间为37个月。全组3年LRFS、DMFS、OS和PFS率分别为92.2%、92.4%、96.4%和84.4%。在PSM之前(3年率分别为91.1%对92.6%,P = 0.94;95.6%对91.5%,P = 0.08;95.2%对96.8%,P = 0.80;85.9%对84.0%,P = 0.38)和PSM之后(90.7%对92.7%,P = 0.77;96.8%对93.7%,P = 0.29;94.5%对93.9%,P = 0.57;84.7%对85.6%,P = 0.96),IC + RT组和IC + CCRT/AC组在LRFS、DMFS、OS和PFS方面均无显著差异。多因素分析表明,治疗方案不是生存率的独立预测因素。IC + RT组患者的治疗相关急性毒性较少,耐受性较好。对于诱导化疗后EBV DNA阴性的NPC患者,IC + RT与IC + CCRT/AC显示出相似的生存结果。