School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University, Beijing 100872, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;20(6):5204. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065204.
Studies on policy change focus on governmental decision-making from a technical rationality perspective, ignoring the fact that policy change is a complicated social construction process involving multiple actors. This study used the modified advocacy coalition framework to explain changes in China's family planning policy and discourse network analysis to show the debate on the birth control policy among multiple actors (central government, local governments, experts, media, and the public). It found that the dominant coalition and the minority coalition can learn and adjust deep core beliefs from each other; the sharing and flow of actors' policy beliefs drive change in the network structure; and actors' obvious preferential attachment when the promulgation of the central document, are all helpful in policy change. This study can explain macro-policy changes from a micro-perspective to reveal the process and mechanism of policy changes in China's authoritarian regime.
研究政策变革主要关注政府决策的技术理性视角,而忽略了政策变革是一个涉及多方参与者的复杂社会建构过程。本研究运用修正后的倡导联盟框架来解释中国计划生育政策的变化,并采用话语网络分析展示了多方参与者(中央政府、地方政府、专家、媒体和公众)对计划生育政策的争论。研究发现,主导联盟和少数联盟可以相互学习和调整深层核心信念;参与者政策信念的共享和流动推动了网络结构的变化;中央文件颁布时,参与者明显的优先依附关系,都有助于政策变革。本研究可以从微观角度解释宏观政策变化,揭示中国威权体制下政策变化的过程和机制。