Krauss J S, Drew P A, Jonah M H, Trinh M, Shell S, Black L, Baisden C R
Clin Chem. 1986 May;32(5):860-2.
Using both densitometry and anion-exchange microchromatography, we measured hemoglobin C (Hb C) and Hb A2 proportions in 11 patients, eight of whom had Hb AC, two Hb SC, and one Hb CC. For one patient with Hb SC, we made the determinations before and after a transfusion. The mean (and SD) for the sum of Hb C + Hb A2 by densitometry and anion-exchange microchromatography for the nine patients with Hb AC and Hb CC were 45 (18) and 40 (18)%, respectively (p greater than 0.1, r = 0.98); for the three determinations involving the two Hb SC patients, the respective proportions were 40 (9.9) and 38 (6.6)% (r = 0.88). Electrophoretic analysis of microchromatographic eluates from the Hb AC and Hb CC patients showed that 6% of the absorbance of the late high-ionic-strength eluate was due to Hb C, which was responsible for the statistically insignificant difference between densitometric and chromatographic values for Hb C + A2 values. Electrophoresis on cellulose acetate of concentrated eluates of the Hb C + A2 fraction from the two Hb SC patients revealed no contamination by Hb S. Evidently, microchromatography can be used to determine Hb C + A2 in patients with Hb C or Hb SC disease or Hb C trait.
我们使用光密度测定法和阴离子交换微色谱法,对11例患者的血红蛋白C(Hb C)和Hb A2比例进行了测量,其中8例为Hb AC,2例为Hb SC,1例为Hb CC。对于1例Hb SC患者,我们在输血前后进行了测定。9例Hb AC和Hb CC患者通过光密度测定法和阴离子交换微色谱法测得的Hb C + Hb A2总和的平均值(及标准差)分别为45(18)%和40(18)%(p大于0.1,r = 0.98);对于涉及2例Hb SC患者的3次测定,相应比例分别为40(9.9)%和38(6.6)%(r = 0.88)。对Hb AC和Hb CC患者微色谱洗脱液的电泳分析表明,高离子强度后期洗脱液吸光度的6%归因于Hb C,这就是Hb C + A2光密度测定值与色谱测定值之间统计学上无显著差异的原因。对2例Hb SC患者Hb C + A2组分浓缩洗脱液进行醋酸纤维素电泳,结果显示无Hb S污染。显然,微色谱法可用于测定Hb C或Hb SC疾病或Hb C性状患者的Hb C + A2。