• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标记螺钉在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MS-MIS TLIF)中的应用:前景与优势。

Marker Screw Utilization for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MS-MIS TLIF): Promises and Advantages.

机构信息

Department Surgery, Orthopaedic Division, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 22384, Saudi Arabia.

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah 22384, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 16;59(3):585. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030585.

DOI:10.3390/medicina59030585
PMID:36984586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10056701/
Abstract

: Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) has been investigated and shown excellent short- and long-term outcomes. In this paper, we describe a new MIS-TLIF technique and pedicle screw insertion using a marker screw as a guidance method. Moreover, we report perioperative, postoperative, and patient-related outcomes. In addition, this paper outlines major differences in radiation exposure, cost effectiveness and accuracy of Marker Screw Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MS-MIS TLIF) compared to other techniques. We report our technique to share our knowledge and experience with the aim of achieving a better MIS-TLIF that would help both surgeons and patients. : A prospective case series was conducted between October 2018 and February 2021. Patients undergoing MS-MIS TLIF with marker screws were consecutively included. The surgery did not exceed two levels. The patients' medical records were reviewed, and the included patients were asked to complete two outcome-questionnaires before surgery and at the six-month visit. The surgical technique is described in this paper. : A total of 37 patients were recruited. The mean age was 57.35 ± 12.8 years, and more than half of the patients were females. The most common indications for surgery were degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis, with the typical level at L4-5. The operative time was 3.02 ± 0.83 h, while the estimated blood loss was 127.7 ± 71.1 mL. The average time for ambulation and hospitalization was 1 ± 1.1 and 2.84 ± 1.4 days, respectively. The patients described significant improvement in both questionnaires. No screw-related complications or screw revisions were needed up to two years of follow-up. : The use of marker screws for pedicle screw placement through a minimally invasive fashion is shown to be a promising technique that can overcome many drawbacks, including cost, operative time, and radiation exposure. Performing MS-MIS TLIF can achieve a 360- degree fusion compared to percutaneous MIS-TLIF.

摘要

经皮微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)已被广泛研究并证实具有良好的短期和长期效果。本文介绍了一种新的 MIS-TLIF 技术和使用标记螺钉作为引导方法的椎弓根螺钉置入技术。此外,我们还报告了围手术期、术后和患者相关的结果。此外,本文还概述了与其他技术相比,标记螺钉微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MS-MIS TLIF)在辐射暴露、成本效益和准确性方面的主要差异。我们报告我们的技术是为了分享我们的知识和经验,旨在实现更好的 MIS-TLIF,这将有助于外科医生和患者。

本研究为前瞻性病例系列研究,时间为 2018 年 10 月至 2021 年 2 月。连续纳入接受 MS-MIS TLIF 联合标记螺钉的患者。手术不超过两个节段。回顾患者病历,在术前和术后 6 个月要求纳入患者完成两项结果调查问卷。本文描述了手术技术。

共纳入 37 例患者,平均年龄 57.35±12.8 岁,女性患者多于男性。最常见的手术指征为退行性椎间盘疾病和腰椎滑脱,典型病变位于 L4-5 节段。手术时间为 3.02±0.83 小时,估计失血量为 127.7±71.1 毫升。平均下床和住院时间分别为 1±1.1 天和 2.84±1.4 天。患者在两项问卷中均描述了显著的改善。在随访 2 年期间,无需螺钉相关并发症或螺钉修正。

通过微创方式使用标记螺钉进行椎弓根螺钉放置显示出是一种很有前途的技术,可以克服许多缺点,包括成本、手术时间和辐射暴露。与经皮 MIS-TLIF 相比,进行 MS-MIS TLIF 可以实现 360 度融合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/7bbf9b7b1e49/medicina-59-00585-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/e7d510a0c3de/medicina-59-00585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/2dbb3aabb2c1/medicina-59-00585-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/e4a4405f4abd/medicina-59-00585-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/04c2ceb7528e/medicina-59-00585-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/7bbf9b7b1e49/medicina-59-00585-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/e7d510a0c3de/medicina-59-00585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/2dbb3aabb2c1/medicina-59-00585-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/e4a4405f4abd/medicina-59-00585-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/04c2ceb7528e/medicina-59-00585-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb68/10056701/7bbf9b7b1e49/medicina-59-00585-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Marker Screw Utilization for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MS-MIS TLIF): Promises and Advantages.标记螺钉在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MS-MIS TLIF)中的应用:前景与优势。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 16;59(3):585. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030585.
2
Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up.机器人辅助与透视辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的比较:2年随访
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):473-485. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01442-5. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
3
Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.经皮全内镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合置钉术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的早期临床评估。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):328-337. doi: 10.1111/os.12900. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
4
Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单节段腰椎滑脱症斜侧方腰椎体间融合术的疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2093-2101. doi: 10.1111/os.13151. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
5
Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results.微创单侧椎弓根螺钉及经椎板关节突螺钉固定与椎间融合治疗单节段下腰椎疾病:手术技术及初步临床结果
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jul 20;12(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0606-z.
6
Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.经皮内镜机器人辅助经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(PE RA-TLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱:技术说明和两年临床结果。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):E73-E86.
7
[Efficacy comparison of robot-assisted versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases].机器人辅助与徒手透视辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的疗效比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Oct 8;104(37):3498-3505. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240330-00729.
8
[Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study].[两种不同技术联合微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症:一项病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 May 25;35(5):409-17. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.05.002.
9
Reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis with a long tab percutaneous pedicle screw system: "swing" technique.经皮椎弓根螺钉系统的短节段融合治疗腰椎滑脱症:“摆动”技术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E11. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18724.
10
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):1960-1968. doi: 10.1111/os.13044. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Latest Developments in Minimally Invasive Spinal Treatment in Slovakia and Its Comparison with an Open Approach for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.斯洛伐克微创脊柱治疗的最新进展及其与开放手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 18;12(14):4755. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144755.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted and augmented reality-assisted spinal instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of screw accuracy and outcomes over the last decade.机器人辅助和增强现实辅助脊柱内固定术:过去十年螺钉准确性和手术效果的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Feb 25;37(2):299-314. doi: 10.3171/2022.1.SPINE211345. Print 2022 Aug 1.
2
Does MIS-TLIF or TLIF result in better pedicle screw placement accuracy and clinical outcomes with navigation guidance?微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)或经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)在导航引导下是否能获得更好的椎弓根螺钉置钉准确性和临床结果?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 16;23(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05106-1.
3
Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Radiologic Parameters in Open TLIF Versus MIS-TLIF in Single- or Double-Level Lumbar Surgeries.
单节段或双节段腰椎手术中开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的临床结果及影像学参数比较
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):962-970. doi: 10.14444/8126. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
4
Reduction of Radiation Exposure by Modifying Imaging Manner and Fluoroscopic Settings during Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion.经皮椎弓根螺钉置入术中通过改变成像方式和透视设置减少辐射暴露
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021 Nov;64(6):933-943. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0338. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
5
Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放式经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(OTLIF)与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MITLIF)的成本效益比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2021 Jun;21(6):945-954. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
6
Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide.定义微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:对全球外科医生所使用技术和工艺的系统评价
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2 Suppl):151S-167S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219882346. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Comparing rates of early pedicle screw loosening in posterolateral lumbar fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.比较经椎间孔腰椎体间融合与单纯后路腰椎融合术治疗后早期椎弓根螺钉松动的发生率。
Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1438-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between O-Arm Navigated and C-Arm Guided Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.O型臂导航与C型臂引导下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术螺钉置入的辐射暴露比较
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e489-e495. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.052. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
9
Decreased radiation exposure using pulsed fluoroscopy and a detachable pedicle marker and probe to place pedicle screws: a comparison to current fluoroscopy techniques and CT navigation.使用脉冲透视法以及可拆卸椎弓根标记物和探针置入椎弓根螺钉以减少辐射暴露:与当前透视技术和CT导航的比较
Spine Deform. 2020 Jun;8(3):405-411. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00086-5. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
10
Differences in the interbody bone graft area and fusion rate between minimally invasive and traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective short-term image analysis.微创与传统经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的椎间骨移植物面积和融合率的差异:回顾性短期影像学分析。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):2095-2102. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06002-4. Epub 2019 Jun 7.