Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University Family Medicine Center, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Pain Physician. 2023 Mar;26(2):125-135.
In the 1990s, radiofrequency ablation emerged as a novel therapeutic approach tool for pain alleviation that did not result in neurological harm. Radiofrequency techniques are emerging methods as a possible option for upper extremity pain management. Furthermore, joint pain can result from multiple etiologies, and the management can differ based on what joint is affected. With the various management methods available to treat joint pain, radiofrequency ablation could be an effective, minimally invasive, promising intervention.
This study aimed to review the current and historical uses of radiofrequency in upper extremity pain compared to other management methods and to address the utilization of radiofrequency in upper extremity pain management.
This is a narrative review of relevant studies on using radiofrequency techniques in upper extremity pain management.
On June 26, 2022, Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, ERIC, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant literature documenting the use of radiofrequency techniques in treating upper extremity pain. The terms "radiofrequency," "pain," "upper extremity," "shoulder," "elbow," and "wrist" were used, resulting in 61 studies fitting the inclusion criteria. A narrative review was then undertaken.
Radiofrequency ablation and its techniques are among the contemporary medical procedures that could be cost-effective solutions for patients suffering from chronic and postoperative pain. Its utilization for shoulder-related pain has been frequently studied, as it showed significant improvement with a high satisfaction rate as a solo procedure. When compared to intraarticular corticosteroid injections or local anesthetics, it was found to be more effective than local anesthetics. Although it did not appear superior to intraarticular corticosteroid injections, it had the advantage of infrequent repeat treatment. By comparison, studies involving the elbow and wrist showed promising results but were not as thorough as studies on the shoulder. Therefore, considering the possible side effects and complications, caution is warranted.
The paucity of articles available on its application to the elbow and wrist joints. More articles are necessary for the generalizability of the results.
Radiofrequency techniques are a promising, minimally invasive procedure for controlling upper extremity pain. More studies on the topic, especially on elbow and wrist pain, are warranted for the generalizability of the results.
20 世纪 90 年代,射频消融作为一种新型的缓解疼痛的治疗方法出现,它不会造成神经损伤。射频技术作为一种可能的选择,用于治疗上肢疼痛。此外,关节疼痛可由多种病因引起,其治疗方法因受影响的关节而异。由于有多种治疗关节疼痛的方法,射频消融术可能是一种有效、微创、有前途的干预措施。
本研究旨在回顾射频在治疗上肢疼痛方面的当前和历史应用,并探讨射频在治疗上肢疼痛管理中的应用。
这是一篇关于使用射频技术治疗上肢疼痛管理的相关研究的综述。
2022 年 6 月 26 日,检索了 Medline/PubMed、Google Scholar、ERIC 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中关于使用射频技术治疗上肢疼痛的相关文献。使用了“射频”、“疼痛”、“上肢”、“肩”、“肘”和“腕”等术语,共纳入 61 项符合纳入标准的研究。然后进行了叙述性综述。
射频消融及其技术是当代医疗程序之一,对于患有慢性和术后疼痛的患者来说,可能是一种具有成本效益的解决方案。它在肩部相关疼痛方面的应用已经得到了广泛的研究,作为一种单一的治疗方法,它显示出了显著的改善效果,并且患者满意度很高。与关节内皮质类固醇注射或局部麻醉相比,它的效果更好。虽然它并不比关节内皮质类固醇注射优越,但它的优点是不需要频繁重复治疗。相比之下,涉及肘部和腕部的研究结果有一定的前景,但不如肩部研究那么深入。因此,考虑到可能的副作用和并发症,需要谨慎使用。
关于其在肘部和腕部关节应用的文章很少。需要更多的文章来使结果具有普遍性。
射频技术是一种有前途的微创治疗上肢疼痛的方法。需要更多关于该主题的研究,特别是关于肘部和腕部疼痛的研究,以提高结果的普遍性。