Department of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neurotoxicology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India (
J Clin Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 27;84(2):23f14863. doi: 10.4088/JCP.23f14863.
Two recent cohort studies, one from Norway and the other from Taiwan, examined for perhaps the first time whether gestational exposure to benzodiazepines and to z-hypnotics was associated with a clinical diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in offspring. The studies had important methodological strengths that are not often seen; these included actual assessment during pregnancy of whether drugs prescribed were used, and, if so, when; adjustment of analyses for postbaseline time-varying covariates; inclusion of discordant sibling pair and paternal exposure analyses; inclusion of pre-pregnancy vs intrapregnancy analyses; and others. The studies also had important limitations; these included inadequate statistical power resulting in a failure to identify potential associations in even unadjusted analyses; lack of information on intermittent use vs daily dosing; and others. The strengths and limitations are identified and explained to empower readers to identify similar issues in other studies. Important findings apparent in these studies are that benzodiazepine exposure may be associated with an increased risk of both ASD and ADHD, regardless of the trimester of exposure. The magnitude of increased risk is small and diminishes to statistical nonsignificance in adjusted analyses. The risks appear elevated in association with paternal exposure. In discordant sibling pair analyses, risks do not appear to be significantly higher in the exposed sib relative to the unexposed sib. These findings imply that observed associations, if any, between gestational exposure to benzodiazepines and ASD or ADHD in offspring may be due to maternal and paternal genetic factors, to family environmental variables, and to confounding by indication, rather than to benzodiazepine exposure itself. Nevertheless, decision-making should be tailored to individual context and shared between prescriber and patient. Finally, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the neurodevelopmental safety of z-drug exposure during pregnancy.
两项最近的队列研究,一项来自挪威,另一项来自中国台湾,首次探讨了胎儿在妊娠期暴露于苯二氮䓬类药物和 Z 类催眠药是否与后代自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的临床诊断有关。这些研究具有重要的方法学优势,这些优势在其他研究中并不常见;包括在怀孕期间实际评估所开药物是否使用,如果使用,何时使用;对分析进行调整以纳入基线后随时间变化的协变量;纳入不一致的同胞对和父亲暴露分析;纳入孕前与孕期内分析;以及其他。这些研究也有重要的局限性;这些局限性包括统计能力不足,即使在未调整的分析中也未能发现潜在的关联;缺乏关于间歇性使用与每日剂量的信息;以及其他。这些优势和局限性被识别并解释,以使读者能够识别其他研究中的类似问题。这些研究中的重要发现是,无论暴露于孕期的哪个阶段,苯二氮䓬类药物暴露都可能与 ASD 和 ADHD 的风险增加相关。风险增加的幅度较小,在调整分析中降至统计学无显著性。风险似乎与父亲暴露相关而升高。在不一致的同胞对分析中,暴露的同胞相对于未暴露的同胞,风险似乎没有显著升高。这些发现表明,如果在胎儿期暴露于苯二氮䓬类药物与后代的 ASD 或 ADHD 之间存在任何观察到的关联,可能是由于母亲和父亲的遗传因素、家庭环境变量以及指示性混杂因素,而不是苯二氮䓬类药物暴露本身。尽管如此,决策仍应根据个体情况进行调整,并在医生和患者之间进行共享。最后,不能就妊娠期 Z 类药物暴露对神经发育的安全性得出任何结论。