Suppr超能文献

急性弛缓性脊髓炎患儿神经转移候选者的手动肌肉测试诊断准确性。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Manual Muscle Testing to Identify Nerve Transfer Candidates in Children with Acute Flaccid Myelitis.

机构信息

From the Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles.

Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Nov 1;152(5):1057-1067. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010457. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Manual muscle testing is a mainstay of strength assessment despite not having been compared with intraoperative electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves.

METHODS

Intraoperative electrical stimulation served as the reference standard in evaluating predictive accuracy of the Active Movement Scale (AMS) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Retrospective consecutive sampling of all patients with AFM who underwent exploration or nerve transfer at a pediatric multidisciplinary brachial plexus and peripheral nerve center from March of 2016 to July of 2020 were included. The nonparametric area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Optimal cutoff score (Youden J ) and diagnostic accuracy values were reported. The AMS and MRC scale were directly compared for predictive superiority.

RESULTS

A total of 181 upper extremity nerves (73 donor nerve candidates and 108 recipient nerve candidates) were tested intraoperatively from 40 children (mean age ± SD, 7.9 ± 4.9 years). The scales performed similarly ( P = 0.953) in classifying suitable donor nerves with satisfactory accuracy (AUC AMS , 71.5%; AUC MRC , 70.7%; optimal cutoff, AMS >5 and MRC >2). The scales performed similarly ( P = 0.688) in classifying suitable recipient nerves with good accuracy (AUC AMS , 92.1%; AUC MRC :, 94.9%; optimal cutoff, AMS ≤3 and MRC ≤1).

CONCLUSIONS

Manual muscle testing is an accurate, noninvasive means of identifying donor and recipient nerves for transfer in children with acute flaccid myelitis. The utility of these results is in minimizing unexpected findings in the operating room and aiding in the development of contingency plans. Further research may extend these findings to test the validity of manual muscle testing as an outcome measure of the success of nerve transfer.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, I.

摘要

背景

尽管尚未与外周神经的术中电刺激进行比较,但手动肌肉测试仍然是力量评估的主要手段。

方法

术中电刺激作为评估主动运动量表(AMS)和医学研究委员会(MRC)量表预测准确性的参考标准。回顾性连续采集 2016 年 3 月至 2020 年 7 月在一家儿科多学科臂丛神经和周围神经中心接受探查或神经转移的所有急性弛缓性麻痹患者的所有数据。计算非参数曲线下面积(AUC)。报告最佳截断值(Youden J)和诊断准确性值。直接比较 AMS 和 MRC 量表的预测优势。

结果

共对 40 名儿童的 181 条上肢神经(73 条供体神经候选者和 108 条受体神经候选者)进行了术中测试(平均年龄±标准差,7.9±4.9 岁)。这两个量表在分类合适的供体神经方面具有相似的性能(P=0.953),具有令人满意的准确性(AMS 的 AUC,71.5%;MRC 的 AUC,70.7%;最佳截断值,AMS>5 和 MRC>2)。这两个量表在分类合适的受体神经方面也具有相似的性能(P=0.688),具有良好的准确性(AMS 的 AUC,92.1%;MRC 的 AUC,94.9%;最佳截断值,AMS≤3 和 MRC≤1)。

结论

手动肌肉测试是一种准确、无创的方法,可以识别患有急性弛缓性麻痹儿童的供体和受体神经进行转移。这些结果的实用性在于最大限度地减少手术室中的意外发现,并有助于制定应急计划。进一步的研究可能会扩展这些发现,以测试手动肌肉测试作为神经转移成功的结果测量的有效性。

临床问题/证据水平:诊断,I。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验