Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Oct;315(8):2305-2312. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02609-2. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines include clear recommendations for the appropriate resection margins in non-acral cutaneous melanoma, the required margin for acral melanoma is controversial. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate whether narrow-margin excision is warranted for thick acral melanoma. Records from 277 melanoma patients with stage T3-T4 disease who underwent radical surgery in three centers in China from September 2010 to October 2018 were reviewed. Clinicopathologic data, including age, gender, excision margin (1-2 cm versus ≥ 2 cm), Clark level, Breslow thickness, ulceration, N stage and adjuvant therapy, were included for survival analysis. The patients were followed up until death or March 31, 2021. Log-rank and Cox regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local and in-transit recurrence-free survival (LITRFS). Among all enrolled patients, 207 (74.7%) had acral melanoma, and 70 (25.3%) had non-acral cutaneous melanoma. No significant difference in baseline characteristics was identified between non-acral and acral melanoma, except for age (p = 0.004), gender (p = 0.009) and ulceration (p = 0.048). In non-acral melanoma, a resection margin of 1-2 cm was a poor independent prognostic factor for OS [p = 0.015; hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI), 0.26 (0.009-0.77)] and LITRFS [p = 0.013; HR (95% CI), 0.19 (0.05-0.71)] but not for DFS [p = 0.143; HR (95% CI), 0.51 (0.21-1.25)]. Forty-three (20.8%) patients in the acral melanoma group had a 1-2-cm resection margin. The resection margin was not correlated with patients' OS (p = 0.196 by log-rank analysis, p = 0.865 by multivariate survival analysis), DFS (p = 0.080 by log-rank analysis, p = 0.758 by multivariate survival analysis) or LITRFS (p = 0.354 by log-rank analysis) in acral melanoma. As recommended in the NCCN guidelines, a resection margin ≥ 2 cm is required for non-acral cutaneous melanoma. Meanwhile, a narrow resection margin (1-2 cm) may be safe for patients with acral melanoma.
虽然国家综合癌症网络 (NCCN) 指南中包含了非肢端皮肤黑色素瘤适当切除边缘的明确建议,但肢端黑色素瘤的所需切缘仍存在争议。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在研究对于厚型肢端黑色素瘤,窄切缘切除是否合理。我们分析了 2010 年 9 月至 2018 年 10 月在中国三个中心接受根治性手术的 277 例 T3-T4 期黑色素瘤患者的记录。包括年龄、性别、切除边缘(1-2cm 与≥2cm)、Clark 分级、Breslow 厚度、溃疡、N 分期和辅助治疗等临床病理数据均纳入生存分析。患者随访至死亡或 2021 年 3 月 31 日。采用对数秩检验和 Cox 回归分析来确定总生存期 (OS)、无病生存期 (DFS)、局部和远处转移复发无病生存期 (LITRFS)的预后因素。在所有纳入的患者中,207 例 (74.7%) 为肢端黑色素瘤,70 例 (25.3%) 为非肢端皮肤黑色素瘤。非肢端和肢端黑色素瘤患者的基线特征除年龄 (p=0.004)、性别 (p=0.009) 和溃疡 (p=0.048) 外,无显著差异。在非肢端黑色素瘤中,1-2cm 的切除边缘是 OS [p=0.015;风险比 (HR)(95%CI),0.26(0.009-0.77)] 和 LITRFS [p=0.013;HR(95%CI),0.19(0.05-0.71)] 的不良独立预后因素,但不是 DFS [p=0.143;HR(95%CI),0.51(0.21-1.25)]。肢端黑色素瘤组中 43 例(20.8%)患者的切除边缘为 1-2cm。切除边缘与患者的 OS(log-rank 分析,p=0.196;多变量生存分析,p=0.865)、DFS(log-rank 分析,p=0.080;多变量生存分析,p=0.758)或 LITRFS(log-rank 分析,p=0.354)无相关性。根据 NCCN 指南的建议,非肢端皮肤黑色素瘤需要切除边缘≥2cm。同时,对于肢端黑色素瘤患者,窄切缘(1-2cm)可能是安全的。