Suppr超能文献

1.1GBq(30mCi)放射性碘消融术对低危甲状腺癌患者是否必要?一项长期随访前瞻性研究的结果。

Is radioiodine ablation with 1.1 GBq (30 mCi) I necessary in low-risk thyroid cancer patients? Results from a long-term follow-up prospective study.

机构信息

Thyroid Department of Sociedad Argentina de Endocrinología y Metabolismo, Díaz Vélez 3889, (C1200AAF), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Endocrine. 2023 Jun;80(3):606-611. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03306-w. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), remnant ablation with radioiodine (RA) after total thyroidectomy (TT) is controversial. No benefits have been demonstrated in terms of mortality or disease-free survival. Recent evidence found that RA did not improve mid-term outcomes.

PURPOSE

To evaluate initial response to treatment and long-term follow-up status in low-risk DTC patients after TT vs. TT + RA with I 1.11 GBq (30 mCi).

METHODS

Prospective multicenter non-randomized study; 174 low-risk DTC that underwent TT were recruited an divided in two groups according to RA (87 ablated and 87 non-ablated). Response to treatment was evaluated at 6-18 months after thyroidectomy and at the end of follow-up with measurements of thyroglobulin, and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies levels, and neck ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. Ablated patients: median age 45.5 years, 84% females, 95.4% papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), mean tumor size 16 mm; non-ablated: median age 45 years, 88.5% females, 96.6% PTC, mean tumor size 14 mm. Response to initial treatment was similar between both groups, with < 2% of structural incomplete response. Final status was evaluated in 139 cases (median follow-up of 60 months). Among ablated patients, 82.8% had no evidence of disease (NED), 12% had an indeterminate response (IR) and 5% a biochemical incomplete response (BIR). Non-ablated patients had NED in 90%, IR in 8.7% and BIR in 1.2%. No statistical difference was found between groups (p = 0.29). No patient had evidence of structural disease at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the recommendation against routine RA in low-risk DTC patients.

摘要

背景

对于低危分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者,甲状腺全切术后进行放射性碘(RA)清甲治疗尚存争议。目前并无证据表明该治疗可降低死亡率或改善无病生存率。近期研究发现,RA 并不能改善中期预后。

目的

评估低危 DTC 患者甲状腺全切术(TT)后与 TT+111GBq(30mCi)RA 治疗后的初始治疗应答和长期随访结果。

方法

前瞻性多中心非随机研究;共纳入 174 例低危 DTC 患者,根据是否行 RA 治疗分为两组(87 例行 RA 治疗,87 例未行 RA 治疗)。治疗应答评估在甲状腺切除术后 6-18 个月进行,随访结束时通过测量甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)和抗甲状腺球蛋白抗体(TgAb)水平及颈部超声进行评估。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似。RA 治疗组患者的中位年龄为 45.5 岁,84%为女性,95.4%为甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC),肿瘤平均直径为 16mm;未行 RA 治疗组患者的中位年龄为 45 岁,88.5%为女性,96.6%为 PTC,肿瘤平均直径为 14mm。两组患者的初始治疗应答无显著差异,结构不完全应答比例均<2%。最终状态评估共纳入 139 例患者(中位随访时间 60 个月)。RA 治疗组中,82.8%的患者无疾病证据(NED),12%为不确定应答(IR),5%为生化不完全应答(BIR);未行 RA 治疗组中,90%的患者为 NED,8.7%为 IR,1.2%为 BIR。两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.29)。随访结束时,两组患者均无结构疾病证据。

结论

本研究结果支持不常规推荐低危 DTC 患者行 RA 治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验