Marchant Danielle J, Martínez Rodríguez Ana, Francelle Pascaline, Jones John Iwan, Kratina Pavel
School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023 Apr 15;255:114834. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114834. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
Microplastics are now ubiquitous in freshwater environments. As most previous research has focused on species-specific effects of microplastics under controlled laboratory conditions, little is known about the impact of microplastics at higher levels of ecological organisation, such as freshwater communities and their associated ecosystem functions. To fill this knowledge gap, an outdoor experiment using 40 freshwater mesocosms, each 1.57 m, was used to determine the effects of (i) microplastic type: traditional oil-based high-density polyethylene versus bio-based biodegradable polylactic acid, (ii) concentration of microplastic particles and (iii) nutrient enrichment. The two concentrations of microplastics used were equivalent to measured environmentally occurring concentrations and concentrations known to cause toxicological effects under laboratory conditions. Freshwater communities are also at increasing risk from nutrient enrichment, which can alter community composition in favour of competitively dominant taxa. The independent and interactive effects of these treatments on pelagic community structure (phytoplankton standing stock, taxonomic richness, and composition) and ecosystem functioning (periphyton productivity and leaf litter decomposition) were assessed. Taxonomic richness and community composition were not affected by exposure to the experimental treatments and there were no significant treatment effects on phytoplankton standing stock, periphyton productivity, total or microbial leaf litter decomposition. Overall, multiple microplastic exposures, crossed with nutrient addition had little impact on the structure and functioning of semi-natural freshwater ecosystems. These findings indicate that the negative impacts of microplastics predicted from species-specific studies may not be readily realised at the ecosystem scale.
微塑料如今在淡水环境中无处不在。由于此前大多数研究都聚焦于在可控实验室条件下微塑料对特定物种的影响,对于微塑料在更高生态组织层面的影响,比如对淡水群落及其相关生态系统功能的影响,我们了解甚少。为填补这一知识空白,我们开展了一项室外实验,使用了40个淡水中型生态系统,每个生态系统的尺寸为1.57米,以确定以下因素的影响:(i)微塑料类型:传统油基高密度聚乙烯与生物基可生物降解聚乳酸;(ii)微塑料颗粒浓度;以及(iii)营养物质富集情况。所使用的两种微塑料浓度分别相当于实测的环境浓度以及在实验室条件下已知会产生毒理学效应的浓度。淡水群落也因营养物质富集而面临越来越大的风险,营养物质富集可能会改变群落组成,使竞争优势类群受益。我们评估了这些处理对浮游生物群落结构(浮游植物现存量、分类丰富度和组成)和生态系统功能(附生植物生产力和落叶分解)的独立和交互影响。分类丰富度和群落组成不受实验处理暴露的影响,并且实验处理对浮游植物现存量、附生植物生产力、总落叶或微生物落叶分解均无显著影响。总体而言,多种微塑料暴露与添加营养物质相结合,对半天然淡水生态系统的结构和功能影响甚微。这些发现表明,从特定物种研究中预测的微塑料负面影响在生态系统尺度上可能并不容易显现出来。