• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与腹腔镜根治性远端胃切除术的短期疗效比较。

The comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116023, China.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Mar 29;408(1):131. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02866-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-023-02866-9
PMID:36991272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10060261/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The study's objectives were to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic radical distal gastrectomy (RDG) with laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy (LDG) for patients with gastric cancer and investigate the learning curve of RDG.

METHODS

The cumulative sum (CUSUM) method was used to retrospectively analyze consecutive gastric cancer patients undergoing RDG between January 2019 and October 2021. The duration of surgery, clinical-pathological characteristics, and short-term outcomes were evaluated according to the two phases of the learning curve (learning period versus mastery period). We also compared the clinical-pathological characteristics and short-term outcomes between cases in the mastery period and LDG.

RESULTS

Data from 290 patients were included in this analysis, 135 RDG and 155 LDG cases. The learning period was 20 cases. There were no significant differences in clinical-pathological characteristics between the learning period and mastery period. Compared with the learning period, the mastery period had a significant reduction in total operation time, docking time, pure operation time, and estimated blood loss, and a significant increase in hospital costs (P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.003, and 0.026, respectively). Compared with LDG, robotic cases in mastery period had a longer operative time, shorter first postoperative flatus time, and more hospital costs (P=0.000, 0.005, and 0.000, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

RGD may fasten to recover gastrointestinal function faster after the operation, can be mastered easily after a reasonable number of cases, and was associated with safe and satisfactory short-term outcomes before and after the learning curve.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较机器人辅助远端胃癌根治术(RDG)与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术(LDG)治疗胃癌患者的短期疗效,并探讨 RDG 的学习曲线。

方法

采用累积和(CUSUM)法回顾性分析 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 10 月连续接受 RDG 的胃癌患者。根据学习曲线的两个阶段(学习期和掌握期)评估手术时间、临床病理特征和短期疗效。我们还比较了掌握期病例与 LDG 的临床病理特征和短期疗效。

结果

共纳入 290 例患者,其中 135 例行 RDG,155 例行 LDG。学习期为 20 例。学习期和掌握期的临床病理特征无显著差异。与学习期相比,掌握期的总手术时间、对接时间、纯手术时间和估计出血量显著减少,住院费用显著增加(P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.003 和 0.026)。与 LDG 相比,掌握期机器人手术时间更长,首次术后肛门排气时间更短,住院费用更高(P=0.000、0.005 和 0.000)。

结论

RDG 可能加快术后胃肠道功能恢复,在合理数量的病例后易于掌握,并且在学习曲线前后具有安全和满意的短期疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcd9/10060261/5d9bcfc849a3/423_2023_2866_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcd9/10060261/ed161b017947/423_2023_2866_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcd9/10060261/5d9bcfc849a3/423_2023_2866_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcd9/10060261/ed161b017947/423_2023_2866_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcd9/10060261/5d9bcfc849a3/423_2023_2866_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy.机器人与腹腔镜根治性远端胃切除术的短期疗效比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Mar 29;408(1):131. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02866-9.
2
What are the reasons for a longer operation time in robotic gastrectomy than in laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer?机器人胃癌根治术比腹腔镜胃癌根治术手术时间长的原因是什么?
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):192-198. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6294-x. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
3
Morbidity and short-term surgical outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large cohort study.机器人与腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的发病率和短期手术结局:一项大样本队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3572-3583. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07820-0. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
4
Establishing the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic and Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.腹腔镜和机器人远端胃切除术学习曲线的确立:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2946-2982. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05812-8. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
5
[Comparison of short-term efficacy between robotic and 3D laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].机器人与3D腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治性远端胃切除术的短期疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):350-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200224-00085.
6
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗cT1期胃癌的远端胃切除术的手术结果比较。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1803-1810. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4345-4.
7
Learning curve of robotic distal and total gastrectomy.机器人远端和全胃切除术的学习曲线。
Br J Surg. 2021 Sep 27;108(9):1126-1132. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab152.
8
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of Da Vinci robotic or laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.达芬奇机器人或腹腔镜远端胃大部切除术治疗胃癌的疗效的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Aug 27;100(34):e27012. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027012.
9
The Learning Curve Study of Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: an Analysis of Outcomes of the First 67 Consecutive Cases at a High-Volume Gastric Center.机器人远端胃切除术的学习曲线研究:对一家高容量胃疾病中心连续67例首例病例的结果分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Apr;27(4):783-785. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05498-4. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗胃癌患者的远端胃切除术:一项倾向评分匹配分析
BMC Surg. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01212-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I and II reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜远端胃切除术行毕罗Ⅰ式和Ⅱ式重建的系统评价与Meta分析
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02193-1.
2
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Largest Systematic Reviews of 68,755 Patients and Meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜胃癌切除术:对68755例患者的最大规模系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan;32(1):351-373. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16371-w. Epub 2024 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Safe implementation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer under the requirements for universal health insurance coverage: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide registry database in Japan.在全民健康保险覆盖要求下安全实施胃癌机器人胃切除术:一项使用日本全国登记数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2022 Mar;25(2):438-449. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01257-7. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an overview of systematic reviews with quality assessment of current evidence.
机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗胃癌的系统评价概述:当前证据的质量评估。
Updates Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):573-582. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00793-8. Epub 2020 May 15.
4
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition).《日本胃癌治疗指南2018(第5版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Effectiveness and safety of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜胃癌切除术的有效性和安全性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(7):1450-1463. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_798_18.
6
Should robotic gastrectomy become a standard surgical treatment option for gastric cancer?机器人胃切除术是否应该成为胃癌的标准手术治疗选择?
Surg Today. 2020 Sep;50(9):955-965. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01875-w. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
7
Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术对局部进展期胃癌患者 3 年无病生存率的影响:CLASS-01 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 May 28;321(20):1983-1992. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5359.
8
Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies.机器人胃切除术与腹腔镜胃切除术治疗胃癌的比较:前瞻性观察研究的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1033-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06648-z. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
9
Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study.机器人胃癌根治术治疗临床Ⅰ/Ⅱ期胃癌的临床优势:多中心前瞻性单臂研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Mar;22(2):377-385. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-00906-8. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
What are the reasons for a longer operation time in robotic gastrectomy than in laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer?机器人胃癌根治术比腹腔镜胃癌根治术手术时间长的原因是什么?
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):192-198. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6294-x. Epub 2018 Jun 25.