• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

椎体骨质量评分预测斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉。

Vertebral bone quality score to predict cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 30;18(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03729-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-023-03729-1
PMID:36991489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10061981/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current evidence suggests that the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score is a good parameter for evaluating bone quality. We aimed to assess whether the VBQ score can predict the occurrence of postoperative cage subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery.

METHODS

Patients (n = 102) who had undergone single-level OLIF with a minimal follow-up for 1 year were reviewed in this study. Demographic and radiographic data of these patients were collected. Cage subsidence was defined as ≥ 2 mm of cage migration into the inferior endplate, superior endplate, or both. Further, the MRI-based VBQ score was measured on T1-weighted images. Moreover, univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed. Meanwhile, Pearson analysis was used to evaluate the correlation among the VBQ score, average lumbar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score, and degree of cage subsidence. Furthermore, ad-hoc analysis was used along with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to assess the predictive ability of the VBQ score and average lumbar DEXA T-score.

RESULTS

Of 102 participants, cage subsidence was observed in 39 (38.24%) patients. According to the univariable analysis, patients with subsidence had older age, higher antiosteoporotic drug use, larger disk height change, a more concave morphology of inferior and superior endplates, higher VBQ score, and lower average lumbar DEXA T-score compared to patients without subsidence. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, a higher VBQ score was significantly associated with an increased risk of subsidence (OR = 23.158 ± 0.849, 95% CI 4.381-122.399, p < 0.001), and it was the only significant and independent predictor of subsidence after OLIF. Moreover, the VBQ score was moderately correlated with the average lumbar DEXA T-score (r = - 0.576, p < 0.001) and the amount of cage subsidence (r = 0.649, p < 0.001). Furthermore, this score significantly predicted cage subsidence with an accuracy of 83.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The VBQ score can independently predict postoperative cage subsidence in patients undergoing OLIF surgery.

摘要

背景

目前的证据表明,磁共振成像(MRI)为基础的椎体骨质量(VBQ)评分是评估骨质量的一个很好的参数。我们旨在评估 VBQ 评分是否能预测斜侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)术后发生 cage 下沉。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了 102 例接受单节段 OLIF 手术并至少随访 1 年的患者。收集这些患者的人口统计学和影像学数据。Cage 下沉定义为 cage 向下方终板、上方终板或两者迁移≥2mm。此外,在 T1 加权图像上测量基于 MRI 的 VBQ 评分。进一步进行单变量和多变量二元逻辑回归分析。同时,采用 Pearson 分析评估 VBQ 评分、平均腰椎双能 X 线吸收测定法(DEXA)T 评分和 cage 下沉程度之间的相关性。此外,采用专门分析和接收者操作特征曲线分析来评估 VBQ 评分和平均腰椎 DEXA T 评分的预测能力。

结果

在 102 名参与者中,39 名(38.24%)患者出现 cage 下沉。根据单变量分析,与无下沉的患者相比,下沉患者的年龄更大,使用抗骨质疏松药物更多,椎间盘高度变化更大,下方和上方终板的形态更凹,VBQ 评分更高,平均腰椎 DEXA T 评分更低。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,较高的 VBQ 评分与增加的下沉风险显著相关(OR=23.158±0.849,95%CI 4.381-122.399,p<0.001),并且是 OLIF 后下沉的唯一显著且独立的预测因子。此外,VBQ 评分与平均腰椎 DEXA T 评分(r=-0.576,p<0.001)和 cage 下沉量(r=0.649,p<0.001)中度相关。此外,该评分对 cage 下沉的预测准确性为 83.9%。

结论

VBQ 评分可独立预测接受 OLIF 手术的患者术后 cage 下沉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec1/10061981/478f7fe276dd/13018_2023_3729_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec1/10061981/e97f2973dc16/13018_2023_3729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec1/10061981/478f7fe276dd/13018_2023_3729_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec1/10061981/e97f2973dc16/13018_2023_3729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec1/10061981/478f7fe276dd/13018_2023_3729_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Vertebral bone quality score to predict cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion.椎体骨质量评分预测斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 30;18(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03729-1.
2
Novel MRI-based vertebral bone quality score as a predictor of cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.基于磁共振成像的新型椎体骨质量评分作为经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉的预测指标
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 May 13;37(5):654-662. doi: 10.3171/2022.3.SPINE211489. Print 2022 Nov 1.
3
Predictive value of different site-specific MRI-based assessments of bone quality for cage subsidence among patients undergoing oblique lumbar interbody fusion.基于 MRI 的不同特定部位骨质量评估对接受斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术患者的 cage 沉降的预测价值。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 May 17;41(2):246-253. doi: 10.3171/2024.2.SPINE231107. Print 2024 Aug 1.
4
Comparison of predictive value for cage subsidence between MRI-based endplate bone quality and vertebral bone quality scores following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective propensity-matched study.基于 MRI 的终板骨质量和经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后椎体骨质量评分对 cage 沉降的预测价值比较:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Spine J. 2024 Jun;24(6):1046-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.01.014. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
5
Vertebral bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.椎体骨质量评分独立预测经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后椎间笼沉降。
Spine J. 2022 Dec;22(12):2017-2023. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
MRI-based vertebral bone quality score for predicting cage subsidence by assessing bone mineral density following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis.基于 MRI 的椎体骨质量评分通过评估经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后骨密度预测 cage 沉降:一项回顾性分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Sep;32(9):3167-3175. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07854-7. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
7
The predictive value of a novel site-specific MRI-based bone quality assessment, endplate bone quality (EBQ), for severe cage subsidence among patients undergoing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.一种新型基于磁共振成像的特定部位骨质量评估(EBQ)在单纯侧路腰椎间融合术中预测严重 cage 下陷的价值。
Spine J. 2022 Nov;22(11):1875-1883. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.085. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
MRI-based endplate bone quality score predicts cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion.基于 MRI 的终板骨质量评分预测斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后 cage 下沉。
Spine J. 2024 Oct;24(10):1922-1928. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 15.
9
A Novel Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Cage Subsidence After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion.一种新的颈椎骨质量评分可独立预测前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后 cage 沉降。
Neurosurgery. 2023 Apr 1;92(4):779-786. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002269. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
10
A novel MRI-based Cervical-Endplate Bone Quality score independently predicts cage subsidence after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.一种基于磁共振成像的新型颈椎终板骨质量评分可独立预测颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后椎间融合器下沉。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2277-2286. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08250-5. Epub 2024 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Modified vertebral bone quality score is a better predictor of cage subsidence after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and is superior to vertebral bone quality score.改良椎体骨质量评分是经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉的更好预测指标,且优于椎体骨质量评分。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 26. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09178-0.
2
Endplate Hounsfield units outperform lumbar HU and VBQ in predicting cage subsidence after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective cohort study.终板亨氏单位在预测腰椎后路椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉方面优于腰椎亨氏单位和椎体骨密度定量:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09062-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebral bone quality scores for increased utility of bone mineral density screening.比较颈椎、胸椎和腰椎的骨质量评分以提高骨密度筛查的效用。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jan;32(1):20-26. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07484-5. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
2
Combination of vertebral bone quality scores from different magnetic resonance imaging sequences improves prognostic value for the estimation of osteoporosis.不同磁共振成像序列的椎骨骨质评分相结合可提高骨质疏松症评估的预后价值。
Spine J. 2023 Feb;23(2):305-311. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
3
Cage Obliquity and Radiological Outcomes in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion.
Utilizing MRI and CT to identify risk factors associated with cage subsidence.
利用磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)来识别与椎间融合器下沉相关的风险因素。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jul 1;30(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02797-9.
4
The clinical impact of MRI-based vertebral bone quality score for assessment of bone quality.基于MRI的椎体骨质量评分对骨质量评估的临床影响。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09096-1.
5
Predictive value of Hounsfield units and vertebral bone quality on cage subsidence in oblique lateral interbody fusion with bilateral posterior fixation.在双侧后路固定的斜外侧椎间融合术中,Hounsfield单位和椎体骨质量对椎间融合器沉降的预测价值。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 16;20(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06016-3.
6
Emerging MRI-based spine scoring techniques targeting bone quality to assess osteoporosis, vertebral fracture risk, other spinal degenerative diseases, and post-surgical outcomes.基于磁共振成像(MRI)的新兴脊柱评分技术旨在针对骨质量,以评估骨质疏松症、椎体骨折风险、其他脊柱退行性疾病及术后结果。
Radiol Med. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-02029-4.
7
Is the size of the transforaminal lumbar cage a risk factor for cage subsidence? a retrospective cohort study.经椎间孔腰椎融合器的尺寸是融合器下沉的危险因素吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 May 21;48(1):427. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03570-6.
8
[Advances in MRI-based bone quality scoring systems and their clinical applications].[基于磁共振成像的骨质量评分系统进展及其临床应用]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 15;39(3):370-374. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202410072.
9
Magnetic resonance imaging-based bone and muscle quality parameters for predicting clinical subsequent vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebral augmentation.基于磁共振成像的骨与肌肉质量参数预测经皮椎体强化术后临床后续椎体骨折
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Feb 1;15(2):1480-1490. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-712. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
10
Bone turnover markers are risk factors for endplate injuries during lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective case-control study.骨转换标志物是腰椎椎间融合术中终板损伤的危险因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 22;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05585-7.
椎间孔斜向外侧融合术中的 cage 倾斜度与影像学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Nov 15;48(22):1611-1616. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004507. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
The predictive value of a novel site-specific MRI-based bone quality assessment, endplate bone quality (EBQ), for severe cage subsidence among patients undergoing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.一种新型基于磁共振成像的特定部位骨质量评估(EBQ)在单纯侧路腰椎间融合术中预测严重 cage 下陷的价值。
Spine J. 2022 Nov;22(11):1875-1883. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.085. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Patient physiology influences the MRI-based vertebral bone quality score.患者生理机能影响基于 MRI 的椎体骨质量评分。
Spine J. 2022 Nov;22(11):1866-1874. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
6
Bone quality in patients with osteoporosis undergoing lumbar fusion surgery: analysis of the MRI-based vertebral bone quality score and the bone microstructure derived from microcomputed tomography.骨质疏松症患者行腰椎融合术的骨质量:基于 MRI 的椎体骨质量评分和来自微计算机断层扫描的骨微观结构分析。
Spine J. 2022 Oct;22(10):1642-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
7
Novel MRI-based vertebral bone quality score as a predictor of cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.基于磁共振成像的新型椎体骨质量评分作为经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉的预测指标
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 May 13;37(5):654-662. doi: 10.3171/2022.3.SPINE211489. Print 2022 Nov 1.
8
Preoperative MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score assessment in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.术前基于 MRI 的腰椎融合术患者椎体骨质量(VBQ)评分评估。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1301-1308. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
9
Comparative Study of Cage Subsidence in Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.单节段腰椎外侧椎间融合术中椎间融合器下沉的比较研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 2;11(5):1374. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051374.
10
Predictors of subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.腰椎侧方椎间融合术后下沉的预测因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Mar 4;37(2):183-187. doi: 10.3171/2022.1.SPINE201893. Print 2022 Aug 1.