Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, Spine Care Institute, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, Spine Care Institute, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1301-1308. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
The importance of bone status assessment in spine surgery is well recognized. The current gold standard for assessing bone mineral density is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). However, DEXA has been shown to overestimate BMD in patients with spinal degenerative disease and obesity. Consequently, alternative radiographic measurements using data routinely gathered during preoperative evaluation have been explored for the evaluation of bone quality and fracture risk. Opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and more recently, the MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, have both been shown to correlate with DEXA T-scores and predict osteoporotic fractures. However, to date the direct association between VBQ and QCT has not been studied.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between VBQ and spine QCT BMD measurements and assess whether the recently described novel VBQ score can predict the presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis diagnosed with QCT.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional study using retrospectively collected data.
Patients undergoing lumbar fusion from 2014-2019 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative lumbar CT and T1-weighted MRIs were included.
Correlation of the VBQ score with BMD measured by QCT, and association between VBQ score and presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis.
Asynchronous QCT measurements were performed. The average L1-L2 BMD was calculated and patients were categorized as either normal BMD (>120 mg/cm) or osteopenic/osteoporotic (≤120 mg/cm). The VBQ score was calculated by dividing the median signal intensity of the L1-L4 vertebral bodies by the signal intensity of the cerebrospinal fluid on midsagittal T1-weighted MRI images. Inter-observer reliability testing of the VBQ measurements was performed. Demographic data and the VBQ score were compared between the normal and osteopenic/osteoporotic group. To determine the area-under-curve (AUC) of the VBQ score as a predictor of osteopenia/osteoporosis receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. VBQ scores were compared with QCT BMD using the Pearson's correlation.
A total of 198 patients (53% female) were included. The mean age was 62 years and the mean BMI was 28.2 kg/m. The inter-observer reliability of the VBQ measurements was excellent (ICC of 0.90). When comparing the patients with normal QCT BMD to those with osteopenia/osteoporosis, the patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis were significantly older (64.9 vs. 56.7 years, p<.0001). The osteopenic/osteoporotic group had significantly higher VBQ scores (2.6 vs. 2.2, p<.0001). The VBQ score showed a statistically significant negative correlation with QCT BMD (correlation coefficient = -0.358, 95% CI -0.473 - -0.23, p<.001). Using a VBQ score cutoff value of 2.388, the categorical VBQ score yielded a sensitivity of 74.3% and a specificity of 57.0% with an AUC of 0.7079 to differentiate patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis and with normal BMD.
We found that the VBQ score showed moderate diagnostic ability to differentiate patients with normal BMD versus osteopenic/osteoporotic BMD based on QCT. VBQ may be an interesting adjunct to clinically performed bone density measurements in the future.
脊柱手术中骨状态评估的重要性已得到广泛认可。目前评估骨矿物质密度的金标准是双能 X 射线吸收法(DEXA)。然而,DEXA 已被证明在患有脊柱退行性疾病和肥胖的患者中高估了 BMD。因此,人们已经探索了使用术前评估中常规收集的数据进行的替代放射学测量方法,以评估骨质量和骨折风险。机会性定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)和最近的基于 MRI 的椎体骨质量(VBQ)评分均与 DEXA T 评分相关,并可预测骨质疏松性骨折。然而,迄今为止,VBQ 与 QCT 之间的直接关联尚未研究。
本研究的目的是评估 VBQ 与脊柱 QCT BMD 测量之间的相关性,并评估最近描述的新型 VBQ 评分是否可以预测 QCT 诊断的骨质疏松/骨量减少的存在。
研究设计/设置:使用回顾性收集的数据进行的横截面研究。
纳入了 2014 年至 2019 年在一家学术机构接受腰椎融合术的患者,这些患者具有可用的术前腰椎 CT 和 T1 加权 MRI。
VBQ 评分与 QCT 测量的 BMD 的相关性,以及 VBQ 评分与骨质疏松/骨量减少存在的相关性。
进行异步 QCT 测量。计算平均 L1-L2 BMD,并将患者分为正常 BMD(>120mg/cm)或骨质疏松/骨量减少(≤120mg/cm)。VBQ 评分通过将 L1-L4 椎体的平均信号强度除以 midsagittal T1 加权 MRI 图像上的脑脊液信号强度来计算。对 VBQ 测量进行了观察者间可靠性测试。比较正常和骨质疏松/骨量减少组之间的人口统计学数据和 VBQ 评分。为了确定 VBQ 评分作为骨质疏松/骨量减少预测的曲线下面积(AUC),进行了接收器操作特征(ROC)分析。使用 Pearson 相关比较 VBQ 评分与 QCT BMD。
共纳入 198 名患者(53%为女性)。平均年龄为 62 岁,平均 BMI 为 28.2kg/m。VBQ 测量的观察者间可靠性非常好(ICC 为 0.90)。当比较 QCT BMD 正常的患者与骨质疏松/骨量减少的患者时,骨质疏松/骨量减少的患者年龄明显较大(64.9 岁比 56.7 岁,p<.0001)。骨质疏松/骨量减少组的 VBQ 评分明显较高(2.6 比 2.2,p<.0001)。VBQ 评分与 QCT BMD 呈统计学显著负相关(相关系数= -0.358,95%CI -0.473 - -0.23,p<.001)。使用 VBQ 评分截断值 2.388,分类 VBQ 评分的灵敏度为 74.3%,特异性为 57.0%,AUC 为 0.7079,可区分骨质疏松/骨量减少和正常 BMD 的患者。
我们发现 VBQ 评分在区分基于 QCT 的正常 BMD 与骨质疏松/骨量减少 BMD 的患者方面具有中等的诊断能力。VBQ 可能是未来临床上进行骨密度测量的有趣辅助手段。