• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

草食性果蝇科化学感应和解毒基因家族的进化

Evolution of chemosensory and detoxification gene families across herbivorous Drosophilidae.

作者信息

Pelaez Julianne N, Gloss Andrew D, Goldman-Huertas Benjamin, Kim Bernard, Lapoint Richard T, Pimentel-Solorio Giovani, Verster Kirsten I, Aguilar Jessica M, Dittrich Anna C Nelson, Singhal Malvika, Suzuki Hiromu C, Matsunaga Teruyuki, Armstrong Ellie E, Charboneau Joseph L M, Groen Simon C, Hembry David H, Ochoa Christopher J, O'Connor Timothy K, Prost Stefan, Zaaijer Sophie, Nabity Paul D, Wang Jiarui, Rodas Esteban, Liang Irene, Whiteman Noah K

机构信息

Department of Integrative Biology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2023 Mar 16:2023.03.16.532987. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.16.532987.

DOI:10.1101/2023.03.16.532987
PMID:36993186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10055167/
Abstract

Herbivorous insects are exceptionally diverse, accounting for a quarter of all known eukaryotic species, but the genetic basis of adaptations that enabled this dietary transition remains poorly understood. Many studies have suggested that expansions and contractions of chemosensory and detoxification gene families - genes directly mediating interactions with plant chemical defenses - underlie successful plant colonization. However, this hypothesis has been challenging to test because the origins of herbivory in many lineages are ancient (>150 million years ago [mya]), obscuring genomic evolutionary patterns. Here, we characterized chemosensory and detoxification gene family evolution across a genus nested within that includes a recently derived (<15 mya) herbivore lineage of mustard (Brassicales) specialists and carnation (Caryophyllaceae) specialists, and several non-herbivorous species. Comparative genomic analyses revealed that herbivorous have among the smallest chemosensory and detoxification gene repertoires across 12 drosophilid species surveyed. Rates of gene turnover averaged across the herbivore clade were significantly higher than background rates in over half of the surveyed gene families. However, gene turnover was more limited along the ancestral herbivore branch, with only gustatory receptors and odorant binding proteins experiencing strong losses. The genes most significantly impacted by gene loss, duplication, or changes in selective constraint were those involved in detecting compounds associated with feeding on plants (bitter or electrophilic phytotoxins) or their ancestral diet (yeast and fruit volatiles). These results provide insight into the molecular and evolutionary mechanisms of plant-feeding adaptations and highlight strong gene candidates that have also been linked to other dietary transitions in .

摘要

食草昆虫种类异常多样,占所有已知真核生物物种的四分之一,但促成这种饮食转变的适应的遗传基础仍知之甚少。许多研究表明,化学感应和解毒基因家族的扩张和收缩——直接介导与植物化学防御相互作用的基因——是成功定殖植物的基础。然而,这一假设一直难以验证,因为许多谱系中的食草起源很古老(>1.5亿年前),掩盖了基因组进化模式。在这里,我们对一个属内的化学感应和解毒基因家族进化进行了表征,该属包括芥菜(十字花目)专家和石竹(石竹科)专家最近衍生的(<1500万年前)食草动物谱系,以及几个非食草物种。比较基因组分析表明,在所调查的12种果蝇物种中,食草果蝇的化学感应和解毒基因库最小。在超过一半的被调查基因家族中,食草动物分支的平均基因周转率显著高于背景率。然而,沿着祖先食草动物分支,基因周转率更为有限,只有味觉受体和气味结合蛋白经历了强烈的损失。受基因丢失、复制或选择约束变化影响最显著的基因是那些参与检测与以植物为食相关的化合物(苦味或亲电植物毒素)或其祖先饮食(酵母和水果挥发物)的基因。这些结果为植物取食适应的分子和进化机制提供了见解,并突出了与果蝇其他饮食转变也有关联的强大基因候选者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f84/10055167/53d2632b720c/nihpp-2023.03.16.532987v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f84/10055167/f2b26fd12975/nihpp-2023.03.16.532987v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f84/10055167/cc828bb9149f/nihpp-2023.03.16.532987v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f84/10055167/53d2632b720c/nihpp-2023.03.16.532987v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f84/10055167/f2b26fd12975/nihpp-2023.03.16.532987v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f84/10055167/cc828bb9149f/nihpp-2023.03.16.532987v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f84/10055167/53d2632b720c/nihpp-2023.03.16.532987v1-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of chemosensory and detoxification gene families across herbivorous Drosophilidae.草食性果蝇科化学感应和解毒基因家族的进化
bioRxiv. 2023 Mar 16:2023.03.16.532987. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.16.532987.
2
Evolution of chemosensory and detoxification gene families across herbivorous Drosophilidae.化感和解毒基因家族在食草果蝇科中的演化。
G3 (Bethesda). 2023 Aug 9;13(8). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad133.
3
Evolution in an ancient detoxification pathway is coupled with a transition to herbivory in the drosophilidae.一条古老解毒途径的进化与果蝇科向食草习性的转变相关联。
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Sep;31(9):2441-56. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu201. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
4
Evolution of herbivory in Drosophilidae linked to loss of behaviors, antennal responses, odorant receptors, and ancestral diet.果蝇科食草行为的进化与行为丧失、触角反应、气味受体及祖先饮食有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 10;112(10):3026-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424656112. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
5
Evolution of Olfactory Receptors Tuned to Mustard Oils in Herbivorous Drosophilidae.草食性双翅目昆虫对芥末油的嗅觉受体的进化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2022 Feb 3;39(2). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab362.
6
Insights into the evolution of herbivory from a leaf-mining fly.从一种潜叶蝇洞察食草行为的演化
Ecosphere. 2024 Apr;15(4). doi: 10.1002/ecs2.4764. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
7
Odorant receptors tuned to isothiocyanates in are co-opted and expanded in herbivorous relatives.在[具体对象]中,对异硫氰酸酯有反应的气味受体在食草动物亲属中被征用并扩展。
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 10:2024.10.08.617316. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.08.617316.
8
Evolution and genomic basis of the plant-penetrating ovipositor: a key morphological trait in herbivorous Drosophilidae.植物穿透产卵器的进化和基因组基础:食草果蝇科的一个关键形态特征。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 9;289(1986):20221938. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1938.
9
Taste evolution in an herbivorous drosophilid.一种食草果蝇的味觉进化
bioRxiv. 2024 Feb 29:2024.02.27.582299. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.27.582299.
10
Genes involved in the evolution of herbivory by a leaf-mining, Drosophilid fly.参与叶食性、果蝇进化的基因。
Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(9):900-16. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs063. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Origins and evolution of biological novelty.生物新颖性的起源与演化。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Oct;98(5):1472-1491. doi: 10.1111/brv.12963. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
2
Taste adaptations associated with host specialization in the specialist Drosophila sechellia.与专性果蝇塞舌尔亚种宿主专化相关的味觉适应。
J Exp Biol. 2023 Feb 1;226(3). doi: 10.1242/jeb.244641. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
3
Evolution and genomic basis of the plant-penetrating ovipositor: a key morphological trait in herbivorous Drosophilidae.植物穿透产卵器的进化和基因组基础:食草果蝇科的一个关键形态特征。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 9;289(1986):20221938. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1938.
4
Phylotranscriptomics Reveals Discordance in the Phylogeny of Hawaiian Drosophila and Scaptomyza (Diptera: Drosophilidae).系统发生转录组学揭示了夏威夷果蝇和 Scaptomyza(双翅目:果蝇科)系统发育的不一致性。
Mol Biol Evol. 2022 Mar 2;39(3). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac012.
5
Evolution of Olfactory Receptors Tuned to Mustard Oils in Herbivorous Drosophilidae.草食性双翅目昆虫对芥末油的嗅觉受体的进化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2022 Feb 3;39(2). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab362.
6
Widespread introgression across a phylogeny of 155 Drosophila genomes.155 个果蝇基因组系统发育树上的广泛基因渗入。
Curr Biol. 2022 Jan 10;32(1):111-123.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.052. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
7
DrosoPhyla: Resources for Drosophilid Phylogeny and Systematics.双翅目:果蝇系统发育和分类学资源。
Genome Biol Evol. 2021 Aug 3;13(8). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evab179.
8
Highly contiguous assemblies of 101 drosophilid genomes.101 种果蝇基因组的高连续组装。
Elife. 2021 Jul 19;10:e66405. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66405.
9
Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation.交互式生命树 (iTOL) v5:一个用于显示和注释系统发育树的在线工具。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jul 2;49(W1):W293-W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301.
10
Evolutionary shifts in taste coding in the fruit pest .味觉编码在水果害虫中的进化转变。
Elife. 2021 Feb 22;10:e64317. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64317.