Zainal Nur Hani, Newman Michelle G
Harvard Medical School.
The Pennsylvania State University.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2023 Mar;11(2):218-238. doi: 10.1177/21677026221114076. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
Vulnerability models posit that executive functioning (EF) problems centrally impact future common (vs. rare) psychopathology symptoms. Conversely, scar theory postulates that depression/anxiety (vs. other psychopathology) symptoms centrally influence reduced EF. However, most studies so far have been cross-sectional. We used cross-lagged panel network analysis to determine temporal and relations on this topic. Community older adults participated across four time-points. Cognitive tests and the caregiver-rated Neuropsychiatric Inventory assessed nine psychopathology and eight cognitive functioning nodes. Nodes with the highest bridge expected influence cross-sectionally were agitation and episodic memory. Episodic memory had the strongest inverse relation with age. Agitation had the strongest negative association with global cognition. EF nodes tended to be centrally impacted by prior depressed and anxious moods rather than influential on any future nodes. Heightened anxious and depressed mood (vs. other nodes) centrally predicted future decreased EF-related (vs. non-EF-related) nodes in older adults, supporting scar (vs. vulnerability) theory.
易感性模型认为,执行功能(EF)问题对未来常见(而非罕见)精神病理学症状具有核心影响。相反,疤痕理论假定抑郁/焦虑(而非其他精神病理学)症状对EF降低具有核心影响。然而,迄今为止,大多数研究都是横断面研究。我们使用交叉滞后面板网络分析来确定该主题上的时间和关系。社区老年人在四个时间点参与研究。认知测试和照料者评定的神经精神科问卷评估了九个精神病理学节点和八个认知功能节点。横断面预期具有最高桥梁作用的节点是激越和情景记忆。情景记忆与年龄的负相关最强。激越与整体认知的负相关最强。EF节点往往受到先前抑郁和焦虑情绪的核心影响,而不是对未来任何节点有影响。在老年人中,焦虑和抑郁情绪加剧(相对于其他节点)可核心预测未来EF相关(相对于非EF相关)节点的减少,这支持了疤痕(而非易感性)理论。