Baethge Anja, Menhardt Ann-Kristin, Frontzkowski Yannick, Schilbach Miriam
Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024 Jan;37(1):86-99. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2023.2183389. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
Time pressure, commonly categorized a challenge stressor, consistently and positively relates to employees' experience of strain. However, regarding its relationship with motivational outcomes such as work engagement researchers have reported positive as well as negative effects.
Drawing on the challenge-hindrance framework, we introduce two explanatory mechanisms (i.e., a loss of time control and an increase of meaning in work) which may explain both, the consistent findings related to strain (here operationalized as irritation) as well as the diverse findings related to work engagement.
We conducted a two-wave survey with a two-week time-lag. The final sample consisted of 232 participants. To test our hypotheses, we used structural equation modeling.
Time pressure negatively and positively related to work engagement through loss of time control and meaning in work. Further, only loss of time control mediated the time pressure-irritation relationship.
Results demonstrate that time pressure likely acts motivating and demotivating at the same time, only through different paths. Hence, our study provides an explanation for the heterogeneous findings regarding the relationship between time pressure and work engagement.
时间压力通常被归类为一种挑战性压力源,它与员工的紧张体验始终呈正相关。然而,关于其与诸如工作投入等激励结果的关系,研究人员报告了积极和消极两种影响。
基于挑战-阻碍框架,我们引入了两种解释机制(即时间控制的丧失和工作意义的增加),这两种机制可能既解释了与紧张相关的一致发现(这里将紧张操作化为恼怒),也解释了与工作投入相关的多样发现。
我们进行了一项有两周时间间隔的两阶段调查。最终样本包括232名参与者。为了检验我们的假设,我们使用了结构方程模型。
时间压力通过时间控制的丧失和工作意义与工作投入呈负相关和正相关。此外,只有时间控制的丧失介导了时间压力与恼怒的关系。
结果表明,时间压力可能同时通过不同路径产生激励和去激励作用。因此,我们的研究为关于时间压力与工作投入关系的异质发现提供了解释。