Suppr超能文献

定量和定性肩部活动范围与患者报告结果的比较。

A comparison of quantitative and qualitative shoulder range of motion with patient-reported outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jul;32(7):1364-1369. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.133. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of shoulder function requires a combination of physical examination of shoulder range of motion and measures of functional outcome measures. Although efforts have been made to define range of motion for clinical evaluation with respect to functional outcomes, a disconnect still exists when defining a successful outcome. We aim to compare quantitative and qualitative measures of shoulder range of motion with patient-reported outcome measures.

METHODS

Data from 100 patients who presented to the office of a single surgeon with a chief complaint of shoulder pain were evaluated for this study. Evaluation included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation relative to the shoulder of interest, demographic information, and range of motion in the shoulder of interest.

RESULTS

Internal rotation angle did not correlate with patient-reported outcomes, whereas external rotation and forward flexion angles did. Qualitative internal rotation as measured by hand-behind-back reach demonstrated a weak to moderate correlation with patient-reported outcomes, and a significant difference in global range of motion and functional outcome measures were identified in patients who can or cannot reach above the belt line or to the thoracic spine. Qualitative assessment of forward flexion demonstrated that patients who can reach specific anatomic landmarks have significantly improved functional outcome measures, and the same is true when comparing patients who can externally rotate past neutral.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand-behind-back reach can be used as a clinical marker of global range of motion and functional outcome measures for patients with shoulder pain. Goniometer measurement of internal rotation has no relationship with patient-reported outcomes. Forward flexion and external rotation assessment with qualitative cutoffs can additionally be used clinically to determine functional outcome for patients with shoulder pain.

摘要

背景

肩部功能的评估需要结合肩部活动范围的体格检查和功能结果测量。尽管已经努力定义与功能结果相关的临床评估的活动范围,但在定义成功结果时仍存在脱节。我们旨在比较肩部运动范围的定量和定性测量与患者报告的结果测量。

方法

对 100 名因肩部疼痛到一名外科医生办公室就诊的患者进行了这项研究的数据评估。评估包括美国肩肘外科医生协会标准化肩部评估表、与感兴趣的肩部相关的单一评估数字评估、人口统计学信息以及感兴趣的肩部的活动范围。

结果

内旋角度与患者报告的结果无关,而外旋和前屈角度则与患者报告的结果相关。通过背后伸手测量的定性内旋与患者报告的结果呈弱到中度相关,并且在能够或不能达到腰带线以上或触及胸椎的患者中,发现了整体活动范围和功能结果测量的显著差异。前屈的定性评估表明,能够触及特定解剖标志的患者具有明显改善的功能结果测量,当比较能够外旋超过中立位的患者时也是如此。

结论

背后伸手可以作为肩部疼痛患者整体活动范围和功能结果测量的临床标志物。量角器测量的内旋与患者报告的结果无关。使用定性截止值评估前屈和外旋也可以在临床上用于确定肩部疼痛患者的功能结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验