Selman Christopher, Mainzer Rheanna, Lee Katherine, Anderson Peter, Burnett Alice, Garland Suzanne M, Patton George C, Pigdon Lauren, Roberts Gehan, Wark John, Doyle Lex W, Cheong Jeanie Ling Yoong
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Nov;108(6):581-587. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-325230. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 25 and 18 years in individuals born extremely preterm (EP, <28 weeks' gestation) or with extremely low birth weight (ELBW, birth weight <1000 g) with term-born (≥37 weeks) controls. Within the EP/ELBW cohort, to determine whether HRQoL differed between those with lower and higher IQs.
HRQoL was self-reported using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) at 18 and 25 years by 297 EP/ELBW and 251 controls born in 1991-1992 in Victoria, Australia. Median differences (MDs) between groups were estimated using multiple imputation to handle missing data.
Adults born EP/ELBW had lower HRQoL (median utility 0.89) at 25 years than controls (median utility 0.93, MD -0.040), but with substantial uncertainty in the estimate (95% CI -0.088 to 0.008) and a smaller reduction at 18 years (MD -0.016, 95% CI -0.061 to 0.029). On individual HUI3 items, there was suboptimal performance on speech (OR 9.28, 95% CI 3.09 to 27.93) and dexterity (OR 5.44, 95% CI 1.04 to 28.45) in the EP/ELBW cohort. Within the EP/ELBW cohort, individuals with lower IQ had lower HRQoL compared with those with higher IQ at 25 (MD -0.031, 95% CI -0.126 to 0.064) and 18 years (MD -0.034, 95% CI -0.107 to 0.040), but again with substantial uncertainty in the estimates.
Compared with term-born controls, young adults born EP/ELBW reported poorer HRQoL, as did those with lower IQ compared with those with higher IQ in the EP/ELBW cohort. Given the uncertainties, our findings need corroboration.
比较极早产儿(EP,孕周<28周)或极低出生体重儿(ELBW,出生体重<1000g)与足月儿(≥37周)对照在25岁和18岁时的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。在极早产儿/极低出生体重儿队列中,确定智商较低和较高的人群之间健康相关生活质量是否存在差异。
采用健康效用指数Mark 3(HUI3)对1991 - 1992年出生在澳大利亚维多利亚州的297名极早产儿/极低出生体重儿和251名对照进行18岁和25岁时的健康相关生活质量自我报告。使用多重填补法处理缺失数据来估计组间中位数差异(MDs)。
极早产儿/极低出生体重儿出生的成年人在25岁时的健康相关生活质量(中位数效用0.89)低于对照组(中位数效用0.93,MD -0.040),但估计值存在很大不确定性(95%CI -0.088至0.008),且在18岁时降低幅度较小(MD -0.016,95%CI -0.061至0.029)。在健康效用指数Mark 3的各个项目上,极早产儿/极低出生体重儿队列在言语(OR 9.28,95%CI 3.09至27.93)和灵活性(OR 5.44,95%CI 1.04至28.45)方面表现欠佳。在极早产儿/极低出生体重儿队列中,智商较低的个体在25岁(MD -0.031,95%CI -0.126至0.064)和18岁时(MD -0.034,95%CI -0.107至0.040)的健康相关生活质量低于智商较高的个体,但估计值同样存在很大不确定性。
与足月儿对照相比,极早产儿/极低出生体重儿出生的年轻成年人报告的健康相关生活质量较差,极早产儿/极低出生体重儿队列中智商较低的个体与智商较高的个体相比也是如此。鉴于存在不确定性,我们的研究结果需要进一步证实。