Seller Carolin, Varga Laura, Börgardts Elizabeth, Vogler Bernadette, Janssen Elisabeth, Singer Heinz, Fenner Kathrin, Honti Mark
Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; Department of Chemistry, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary.
Water Res. 2023 May 15;235:119908. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119908. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Identifying a chemical's potential for biotransformation in the aquatic environment is crucial to predict its fate and manage its potential hazards. Due to the complexity of natural water bodies, especially river networks, biotransformation is often studied in laboratory experiments, assuming that study outcomes can be extrapolated to compound behavior in the field. Here, we investigated to what extent outcomes of laboratory simulation studies indeed reflect biotransformation kinetics observed in riverine systems. To determine in-field biotransformation, we measured loads of 27 wastewater treatment plant effluent-borne compounds along the Rhine and its major tributaries during two seasons. Up to 21 compounds were detected at each sampling location. Measured compound loads were used in an inverse model framework of the Rhine river basin to derive k' values - a compound-specific parameter describing the compounds' average biotransformation potential during the field studies. To support model calibration, we performed phototransformation and sorption experiments with all the study compounds, identifying 5 compounds that are susceptible towards direct phototransformation and determining K values covering four orders of magnitude. On the laboratory side, we used a similar inverse model framework to derive k' values from water-sediment experiments run according to a modified OECD 308-type protocol. The comparison of k' and k' revealed that their absolute values differed, pointing towards faster transformation in the Rhine river basin. Yet, we could demonstrate that relative rankings of biotransformation potential and groups of compounds with low, moderate and high persistence agree reasonably well between laboratory and field outcomes. Overall, our results provide evidence that laboratory-based biotransformation studies using the modified OECD 308 protocol and k' values derived thereof bear considerable potential to reflect biotransformation of micropollutants in one of the largest European river basins.
识别一种化学物质在水生环境中的生物转化潜力对于预测其归宿和管理其潜在危害至关重要。由于天然水体,尤其是河网的复杂性,生物转化通常在实验室实验中进行研究,假设研究结果可以外推到该化合物在野外的行为。在此,我们研究了实验室模拟研究的结果在多大程度上确实反映了在河流系统中观察到的生物转化动力学。为了确定野外生物转化情况,我们在两个季节期间测量了莱茵河及其主要支流沿线27种来自污水处理厂废水的化合物的负荷。每个采样点检测到多达21种化合物。测量的化合物负荷被用于莱茵河流域的反模型框架中,以得出k'值——一个描述化合物在野外研究期间平均生物转化潜力的化合物特异性参数。为了支持模型校准,我们对所有研究化合物进行了光转化和吸附实验,确定了5种易受直接光转化影响的化合物,并测定了涵盖四个数量级的K值。在实验室方面,我们使用了类似的反模型框架,从根据经修改的经合组织308型协议进行的水-沉积物实验中得出k'值。k'和k'的比较表明它们的绝对值不同,这表明莱茵河流域的转化速度更快。然而,我们可以证明,生物转化潜力的相对排名以及低、中、高持久性化合物组在实验室和野外结果之间相当吻合。总体而言,我们的结果提供了证据,表明使用经修改的经合组织308协议进行的基于实验室的生物转化研究及其得出的k'值具有相当大的潜力来反映欧洲最大的流域之一中微污染物的生物转化情况。