Gandevia S C, McKenzie D K
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Apr;60(4):1420-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1986.60.4.1420.
If esophageal and chest wall recordings of diaphragmatic electromyographic activity (EMG) accurately reflect neural drive to this muscle, then compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) produced by supramaximal stimulation of the phrenic nerve should not alter with changes in diaphragmatic position. Maximal CMAPs were therefore recorded 1) during changes in lung volume from near residual volume to near total lung capacity, 2) during isovolume maneuvers at different lung volumes, and 3) while subjects were lying, sitting, and standing. The areas of maximal CMAPs recorded with the gastroesophageal catheter increased 5.1 +/- 3.6 times (mean +/- SD) between these volumes, increased 2.4 +/- 1.3 times as the diaphragm descended during an isovolume maneuver (at functional residual capacity), and increased 4.4 +/- 2.4 times between the lying and standing positions. Because the stimuli were supramaximal, these changes in EMG reflect changes in the relationship between the esophageal electrodes and the diaphragmatic muscle fibers. Artifactual changes were also documented for surface electrodes on the chest wall. Because of these positional changes in maximal CMAPs, previous studies, which used integrated diaphragmatic EMG to document "reflex" changes in neural drive, should be reevaluated.
如果食管和胸壁记录的膈肌肌电图活动(EMG)能准确反映该肌肉的神经驱动,那么膈神经超强刺激所产生的复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)不应随膈肌位置的改变而变化。因此,在以下情况下记录最大CMAP:1)肺容积从接近残气量变为接近肺总量时;2)在不同肺容积下进行等容操作时;3)受试者处于卧位、坐位和站立位时。使用胃食管导管记录的最大CMAP面积在这些容积之间增加了5.1±3.6倍(平均值±标准差),在等容操作(功能残气量时)膈肌下降过程中增加了2.4±1.3倍,在卧位和站立位之间增加了4.4±2.4倍。由于刺激是超强的,这些EMG变化反映了食管电极与膈肌肌纤维之间关系的变化。胸壁表面电极也记录到了伪差变化。由于最大CMAP存在这些位置变化,之前使用整合膈肌EMG记录神经驱动“反射”变化的研究应重新评估。