Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jul;32(7):1412-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.137. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
Interscalene nerve blocks and local anesthetic infiltration are 2 methods commonly used in multimodal analgesia regimens for shoulder arthroplasty. Liposomal bupivacaine is a novel anesthetic that can be detected more than 24 hours following local administration. Studies comparing liposomal bupivacaine with conventional analgesic methods have found mixed results regarding pain and narcotic consumption, and there is little information available regarding patient satisfaction and the role of psychosocial variables.
This is a randomized study of 76 adult patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty who were assigned to receive a preoperative interscalene nerve block with ropivacaine (Block = 38) or an intraoperative periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine (Local = 38). The primary outcomes were narcotic consumption (MEq, morphine equivalents), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and satisfaction (0-10). The secondary outcomes were the effect of patient group preference (Block vs. Local) and psychosocial variables (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Brief Resilience Scale) on satisfaction. Length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, and the number of narcotic refills were tracked from the day of surgery through the first postoperative appointment, which was routinely 7-14 days following surgery.
Intraoperative and day 0 narcotic consumption was lower in the Block group by 17.3 and 21.6 MEq (P < .001, P = .035) with no differences on day 1 or 2. There was no difference in VAS pain scores, length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, or the number of narcotic refills. Patient satisfaction was higher in the Block group (8.3 vs. 6.8, P = .017). Pain catastrophizing, resilience, and patient group preference did not have any significant relationship with patient satisfaction.
Patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty have higher satisfaction with a conventional interscalene block compared to a periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine. There were no clinically important differences in narcotic consumption, VAS pain scores, length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, or the number of narcotic refills. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, and patient preferences did not have any relationship with patient satisfaction.
经斜角肌间隙阻滞和局部麻醉浸润是肩关节炎患者多模式镇痛方案中常用的两种方法。脂质体布比卡因是一种新型麻醉剂,局部给药后 24 小时以上仍可检测到。比较脂质体布比卡因与传统镇痛方法的研究发现,在疼痛和阿片类药物消耗方面的结果喜忧参半,关于患者满意度和心理社会变量的作用的信息很少。
这是一项纳入 76 例接受反向肩关节置换术的成年患者的随机研究,这些患者被分配接受术前罗哌卡因经斜角肌间隙阻滞(阻滞组=38 例)或术中关节周围注射脂质体布比卡因(局部组=38 例)。主要结局指标是阿片类药物消耗量(MEq,吗啡等效物)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和满意度(0-10)。次要结局指标是患者分组偏好(阻滞组与局部组)和心理社会变量(疼痛灾难化量表、简要韧性量表)对满意度的影响。从手术当天到第一次术后预约(术后 7-14 天),跟踪患者的住院时间、与疼痛相关的电话咨询、与疼痛相关的再入院和阿片类药物的续用次数。
阻滞组术中及术后 0 天的阿片类药物消耗量分别降低 17.3 和 21.6 MEq(P<.001,P=.035),而术后 1 天或 2 天则无差异。VAS 疼痛评分、住院时间、与疼痛相关的电话咨询、与疼痛相关的再入院或阿片类药物续用次数均无差异。阻滞组患者满意度更高(8.3 比 6.8,P=.017)。疼痛灾难化、韧性和患者分组偏好与患者满意度无显著相关性。
与关节周围注射脂质体布比卡因相比,接受反向肩关节置换术的患者对常规经斜角肌间隙阻滞的满意度更高。阿片类药物消耗、VAS 疼痛评分、住院时间、与疼痛相关的电话咨询、与疼痛相关的再入院或阿片类药物续用次数均无临床意义的差异。疼痛灾难化量表、简要韧性量表和患者偏好与患者满意度无相关性。