Angerame Marc R, Ruder John A, Odum Susan M, Hamid Nady
Orthopedics. 2017 Sep 1;40(5):e806-e811. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170608-01. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
Postoperative pain control is a significant concern after total shoulder arthroplasty. Injectable periarticular liposomal bupivacaine, which has been found to decrease opioid use after orthopedic procedures, has been proposed as a viable alternative to regional anesthesia. This study compared the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine vs interscalene block among patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty. A retrospective review was conducted of 79 patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon between January 2013 and April 2015. Patient demographics, in-hospital Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score obtained at 12-hour intervals, length of stay, and total in-hospital morphine equivalents in both the bupivacaine (n=25) and block (n=44) groups were recorded. Differences in length of stay, morphine equivalents, and age were assessed with Wilcoxon tests. Sex differences were assessed with the chi-square test. Repeated measures analysis with least square means was used to assess longitudinal changes in NPRS scores. No significant differences were found between groups for sex (P=.89), age (P=.81), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P=.50), preoperative opioid use (P=.41), length of stay (P=.32), or morphine equivalents (P=.71). The average NPRS score in the first 12 hours was 3.01 for the bupivacaine group and 4.41 for the interscalene block group (P=.25). By 48 hours postoperatively, average NPRS scores were similar (P=.93) for the 2 groups, 4.90 for the bupivacaine group and 4.19 for the interscalene block group. The findings for this cohort of patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty showed no significant difference for pain scores, postoperative narcotic use, or length of stay with injectable liposomal bupivacaine vs interscalene block. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):e806-e811.].
全肩关节置换术后的疼痛控制是一个重要问题。可注射的关节周围脂质体布比卡因已被发现在骨科手术后可减少阿片类药物的使用,它被提议作为区域麻醉的一种可行替代方法。本研究比较了脂质体布比卡因与肌间沟阻滞在接受全肩关节置换术患者中的疗效。对2013年1月至2015年4月间由单一外科医生进行解剖型全肩关节置换术的79例患者进行了回顾性研究。记录了患者的人口统计学数据、每隔12小时获得的住院期间数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)得分、住院时间以及布比卡因组(n = 25)和阻滞组(n = 44)的住院期间吗啡当量总量。采用Wilcoxon检验评估住院时间、吗啡当量和年龄的差异。采用卡方检验评估性别差异。使用最小二乘均值的重复测量分析来评估NPRS得分的纵向变化。两组在性别(P = 0.89)、年龄(P = 0.81)、美国麻醉医师协会分级(P = 0.50)、术前阿片类药物使用情况(P = 0.41)、住院时间(P = 0.32)或吗啡当量(P = 0.71)方面均未发现显著差异。布比卡因组前12小时的平均NPRS得分为3.01,肌间沟阻滞组为4.41(P = 0.25)。术后48小时,两组的平均NPRS得分相似(P = 0.93),布比卡因组为4.90,肌间沟阻滞组为4.19。该组接受解剖型全肩关节置换术患者的研究结果表明,可注射脂质体布比卡因与肌间沟阻滞在疼痛评分、术后麻醉药物使用或住院时间方面无显著差异。[《骨科》。2017;40(5):e806 - e811。]