Departments of Pharmacy and Critical Care, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Pharmacy Department, St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, England, Prescot, United Kingdom.
Hum Resour Health. 2023 Mar 31;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00810-y.
Critical care pharmacists improve the quality and efficiency of medication therapy whilst reducing treatment costs where they are available. UK critical care pharmacist deployment was described in 2015, highlighting a deficit in numbers, experience level, and critical care access to pharmacy services over the 7-day week. Since then, national workforce standards have been emphasised, quality indicators published, and service commissioning documents produced, reinforced by care quality assessments. Whether these initiatives have resulted in further development of the UK critical care pharmacy workforce is unknown. This evaluation provides a 2020 status update.
The 2015 electronic data entry tool was updated and circulated for completion by UK critical care pharmacists. The tool captured workforce data disposition as it was just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, at critical care unit level.
Data were received for 334 critical care units from 203 organisations (96% of UK critical care units). Overall, 98.2% of UK critical care units had specific clinical pharmacist time dedicated to the unit. The median weekday pharmacist input to each level 3 equivalent bed was 0.066 (0.043-0.088) whole time equivalents, a significant increase from the median position in 2015 (+ 0.021, p < 0.0001). Despite this progress, pharmacist availability remains below national minimum standards (0.1/level 3 equivalent bed). Most units (71.9%) had access to prescribing pharmacists. Geographical variation in pharmacist staffing levels were evident, and weekend services remain extremely limited.
Availability of clinical pharmacists in UK adult critical care units is improving. However, national standards are not routinely met despite widely publicised quality indicators, commissioning specifications, and assessments. Additional measures are needed to address persistent deficits and realise gains in organisational and patient-level outcomes. These measures must include promotion of cross-professional collaborative working, adjusted funding models, and a nationally recognised training pathway for critical care pharmacists.
危重病药师可以提高药物治疗的质量和效率,同时降低治疗成本。2015 年描述了英国危重病药师的部署情况,突出了在每周 7 天的时间里,药师人数、经验水平和危重病患者获得药学服务的机会存在不足。此后,强调了国家劳动力标准、发布了质量指标、制定了服务委托文件,并通过护理质量评估进行了强化。这些举措是否导致英国危重病药房劳动力进一步发展尚不清楚。本评价提供了 2020 年的最新情况。
更新了 2015 年电子数据输入工具,并分发给英国危重病药师填写。该工具在 COVID-19 大流行之前,以危重病单位为单位,收集了劳动力数据的处置情况。
从 203 个组织中收到了来自 334 个危重病单位的数据。总体而言,98.2%的英国危重病单位有专门的临床药师为单位提供服务。每个 3 级等效床位的工作日药师投入中位数为 0.066(0.043-0.088)个全职等效值,与 2015 年的中位数(+0.021,p<0.0001)相比有显著增加。尽管取得了这一进展,但药师的可用性仍低于国家最低标准(0.1/3 级等效床位)。大多数单位(71.9%)有处方药师。药师人员配备水平的地域差异明显,周末服务仍然极为有限。
英国成人危重病病房临床药师的可用性正在提高。然而,尽管有广泛宣传的质量指标、委托规范和评估,国家标准仍未得到普遍遵守。需要采取额外措施来解决持续存在的不足,并在组织和患者层面的结果上取得进展。这些措施必须包括促进跨专业协作工作、调整资金模式以及为危重病药师建立全国认可的培训途径。