• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感音神经性听力损失患者单词识别分数的临床解读:置信区间、界限和水平

Clinical Interpretation of Word-Recognition Scores for Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Confidence Intervals, Limits, and Levels.

作者信息

Margolis Robert H, Wilson Richard H, Saly George L

机构信息

Audiology Incorporated, Arden Hills, Minnesota, USA.

Arizona State University, Speech and Hearing Science College of Health Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2023;44(5):1133-1139. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001355. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001355
PMID:37005369
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Confidence levels were established to determine if a word-recognition score is within the expected range for a hearing loss group (based on 3-frequency pure-tone average) or significantly below or above the expected range.

DESIGN

Two large clinical databases were mined to produce data-sets composed of word-recognition scores obtained with Q/MASS NU-6 materials and VA NU-6 materials for patients with average hearing losses ranging from 0 to 70 dB HL. Percentiles representing scores that are below (2.5%, 5%, and 10%) and above (90%, 95%, and 97.5%) the expected range (defined as the 80% confidence interval) were established. To estimate the distribution of scores and percentiles for the Auditec NU-6 materials (for which a large database is not available) Q/MASS scores were transformed to Auditec scores based on published psychometric functions.

RESULTS

The resulting confidence levels and expected ranges of word-recognition scores should be useful for interpreting the relationship between a score and the distribution of scores for the patient's hearing loss severity. Confidence levels are described as low, moderate, and high corresponding to the statistical level of assurance that a score is lower or higher than the expected score.

CONCLUSIONS

The confidence levels and expected ranges may be helpful for interpreting word-recognition scores obtained with three widely used sets of NU-6 test materials.

摘要

目的

建立置信水平,以确定单词识别分数是否在听力损失组的预期范围内(基于三频率纯音平均值),或者显著低于或高于预期范围。

设计

挖掘两个大型临床数据库,以生成数据集,这些数据集由使用Q/MASS NU-6材料和VA NU-6材料获得的单词识别分数组成,适用于平均听力损失范围为0至70 dB HL的患者。确定代表低于(2.5%、5%和10%)和高于(90%、95%和97.5%)预期范围(定义为80%置信区间)的分数的百分位数。为了估计Auditec NU-6材料(没有大型数据库)的分数和百分位数分布,根据已发表的心理测量函数将Q/MASS分数转换为Auditec分数。

结果

所得的单词识别分数的置信水平和预期范围应有助于解释分数与患者听力损失严重程度的分数分布之间的关系。置信水平分为低、中、高,分别对应于分数低于或高于预期分数的统计保证水平。

结论

置信水平和预期范围可能有助于解释使用三套广泛使用的NU-6测试材料获得的单词识别分数。

相似文献

1
Clinical Interpretation of Word-Recognition Scores for Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Confidence Intervals, Limits, and Levels.感音神经性听力损失患者单词识别分数的临床解读:置信区间、界限和水平
Ear Hear. 2023;44(5):1133-1139. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001355. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.采用随机呈现水平范式,对听力正常的年轻听众和患有感音神经性听力损失的老年听众在西北大学听觉测试第6号的Auditec和退伍军人事务部(VA)录制版本上的单词识别表现进行比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 May;30(5):370-395. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17135. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
3
A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).在多说话者嘈杂环境中两项单词识别任务的比较:噪声中的语音识别测试(SPRINT)和噪声中的单词测试(WIN)。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jul-Aug;19(7):548-56. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.7.4.
4
Confidence limits for maximum word-recognition scores.最大单词识别分数的置信限。
J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Apr;38(2):490-502. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3802.490.
5
Automated Forced-Choice Tests of Speech Recognition.自动选择语音识别测试。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2021 Oct;32(9):606-615. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733964. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. Materials spoken by the same speaker.CID W-22和NU听力测试第6号的心理测量函数。由同一说话者说出的材料。
Ear Hear. 1997 Oct;18(5):430-3. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199710000-00008.
7
Predicted and measured word-recognition scores unmask distortion in the impaired auditory system.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2025 Apr 1;157(4):2932-2941. doi: 10.1121/10.0036461.
8
Confidence Limits of Word Identification Scores Derived Using Nonlinear Quantile Regression.基于非线性分位数回归的词汇识别得分的置信限。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:2331216520983110. doi: 10.1177/2331216520983110.
9
The homogeneity with respect to intelligibility of recorded word-recognition materials.录制的单词识别材料在可懂度方面的同质性。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Apr;26(4):331-45. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.4.2.
10
Identifying Subclinical Hearing Loss: Extended Audiometry and Word Recognition in Noise.识别亚临床听力损失:扩展听力测试和噪声下的语音识别。
Audiol Neurootol. 2022;27(3):217-226. doi: 10.1159/000518962. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Vowels on the Identification of Spoken Disyllabic Words in the Malayalam Language for Individuals with Hearing Loss.元音对马拉雅拉姆语中听力损失者口语双音节词识别的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Nov 30;14(23):2707. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232707.
2
[Disproportionately high loss in speech intelligibility].[言语清晰度损失过高]
HNO. 2024 Dec;72(12):885-892. doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01518-8. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
3
Accuracy and Consistency of Confidence Limits for Monosyllable Identification Scores Derived Using Simulation, the Harrell-Davis Estimator, and Nonlinear Quantile Regression.
使用模拟、哈雷尔-戴维斯估计器和非线性分位数回归得出的单音节识别分数置信区间的准确性和一致性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 30;14(13):1397. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131397.