Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer - Boon or bane?

INTRODUCTION

Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for inoperable locally advanced head and neck cancer, induction chemotherapy is considered an alternative approach by head and neck oncologists worldwide.

AIMS

To evaluate the response to induction chemotherapy in terms of loco-regional control and treatment-related toxicity in inoperable locally advanced head and neck cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted on patients who received two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy. Following this, response assessment was performed clinically. Grading of radiation-induced oral mucositis and any interruptions in treatment were noted. At 8 weeks following treatment, magnetic resonance imaging-based radiological response assessment was performed using RECIST criteria version 1.1.

RESULTS

Our data revealed 57.7% complete response rate with induction chemotherapy, followed by chemoradiation therapy. We observed that post induction, 67.5% and 47.5% patients had reduction in T-stage (<0.001) and N-stage of disease (<0.001), respectively, with complete response more achieved in younger patients (≤50 years). Chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression and febrile neutropenia occurred in 7.5% patients. We demonstrated that a higher grade of radiation-induced mucositis was noticed among those receiving three cycles of induction chemotherapy (ICT) and aged >50 years.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that induction chemotherapy could still be a viable option for down-staging unresectable locally advanced disease, especially for younger patients in terms of better treatment response and tolerability. The number of cycles of ICT seems to influence radiation-induced mucositis. This study underscores the need for further studies to determine the exact role of ICT in locally advanced head and neck cancer.