Rambau Genevieve M, Sgromolo Nicole, Rhee Peter C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, San Antonio, TX 78261 USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Hand and Microvascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Jan 6;57(4):543-551. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00812-3. eCollection 2023 Apr.
To determine if distraction bridge plate (DBP) fixation as the primary method of stabilization can effectively correct and maintain acceptable radiographic parameters in the treatment of comminuted, intra-articular distal radius fractures while allowing early load-bearing.
A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive intra-articular distal radius fractures that underwent DBP fixation with or without supplemental fixation methods (fragment-specific implants or K-wires). Patients treated with a volar locked plate in addition to DBP were excluded. Radiographic outcomes measures included volar tilt (°), radial height (mm), radial inclination (°), articular step-off (mm), lunate-lunate facet ratio (LLFR), and teardrop angle (°) measured on post-reduction, immediately post-operative, prior to and after DBP removal.
Twenty-three comminuted, intra-articular distal radius fractures were treated with primary DBP fixation. Supplemental fixation was utilized in 10 fractures and included fragment-specific implants ( = 6) and/or K-wires ( = 5). Distraction bridge plates were removed after a mean of 13.6 weeks. At a mean radiographic follow-up of 11.4 weeks (range: 2-45 weeks) following DBP removal, all fractures had united with a mean volar tilt of 6.3° ± 5.8°, radial height of 11.3 ± 2.3 mm, radial inclination of 20.2° ± 4.5°, articular step-off of 0.6 mm ± 0.8, and LLFR of 1.05 ± 0.06. However, the teardrop angle could not be restored to a normal value with DBP fixation. Complications included 1 plate breakage and 1 peri-hardware radial shaft fracture.
Distraction bridge plate fixation is a reliable method to stabilize highly comminuted, intra-articular distal radius fractures in patients with a well-aligned volar rim fragment of the lunate facet.
确定采用撑开桥接钢板(DBP)固定作为主要稳定方法,在治疗粉碎性关节内桡骨远端骨折时,能否有效纠正并维持可接受的影像学参数,同时允许早期负重。
对所有连续接受DBP固定(有或无补充固定方法,即骨折块特异性植入物或克氏针)的关节内桡骨远端骨折进行回顾性研究。排除除DBP外还接受掌侧锁定钢板治疗的患者。影像学结果测量包括复位后、术后即刻、DBP取出前后测量的掌倾角(°)、桡骨高度(mm)、桡骨倾斜角(°)、关节台阶(mm)、月骨-月骨关节面比率(LLFR)和泪滴角(°)。
23例粉碎性关节内桡骨远端骨折采用初次DBP固定治疗。10例骨折采用了补充固定,包括骨折块特异性植入物(n = 6)和/或克氏针(n = 5)。撑开桥接钢板平均在13.6周后取出。在DBP取出后平均11.4周(范围:2 - 45周)的影像学随访中,所有骨折均已愈合,平均掌倾角为6.3°±5.8°,桡骨高度为11.3±2.3mm,桡骨倾斜角为20.2°±4.5°,关节台阶为0.6mm±0.8,LLFR为1.05±0.06。然而,DBP固定无法将泪滴角恢复到正常值。并发症包括1例钢板断裂和1例钢板周围桡骨干骨折。
对于月骨关节面掌侧边缘骨折块对线良好的患者,撑开桥接钢板固定是稳定高度粉碎性关节内桡骨远端骨折的可靠方法。