• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[切开复位内固定与外固定治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折的并发症:一项荟萃分析]

[Complications of open reduction and internal fixation versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis].

作者信息

Yang Z, Yuan Z Z, Ma J X, Ma X L

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Dec 20;96(47):3833-3837. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.47.014.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.47.014
PMID:28057101
Abstract

To make a systematic assessment of the complications of open reduction and internal fixation versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures. A computer-based online search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Springer and Cochrane Library were performed.The randomized and controlled trials of open reduction and internal fixation versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures were collected.The included trials were screened out strictly based on the criterion of inclusion and exclusion.The quality of included trials was evaluated.RevMan 5.0 was used for data analysis. A total of 17 studies involving 1 402 patients were included.There were 687 patients with open reduction and internal fixation and 715 with external fixation.The results of Meta-analysis indicated that there were statistically significant differences with regard to the postoperatively total complications, infection, malunion, tendon rupture (=8%, =0.77(95% 0.65-0.91, =3.10, <0.05). There were no statistically significant differences observed between two approaches with respect to nounion, re-operation, complex regional pain syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome, neurapraxia, tendonitis, painful hardware, scar(>0.05). Postoperative complications are present in both open reduction and internal fixation and external fixation.Compared with external fixation, open reduction and internal fixation is lower in total complications postoperatively, infection and malunion, but external fixation has lower tendon rupture incidence.

摘要

对不稳定型桡骨远端骨折切开复位内固定与外固定的并发症进行系统评估。通过计算机在PubMed、ScienceDirect、EMBASE、BIOSIS、Springer和Cochrane图书馆进行在线检索。收集不稳定型桡骨远端骨折切开复位内固定与外固定的随机对照试验。严格根据纳入和排除标准筛选纳入的试验。评估纳入试验的质量。使用RevMan 5.0进行数据分析。共纳入17项研究,涉及1402例患者。切开复位内固定组687例,外固定组715例。Meta分析结果表明,术后总并发症、感染、畸形愈合、肌腱断裂方面存在统计学显著差异(=8%,=0.77(95% 0.65 - 0.91,=3.10,<0.05)。两种方法在不愈合、再次手术、复杂性区域疼痛综合征、腕管综合征、神经失用、肌腱炎、内固定物疼痛、瘢痕方面未观察到统计学显著差异(>0.05)。切开复位内固定和外固定术后均存在并发症。与外固定相比,切开复位内固定术后总并发症、感染和畸形愈合发生率较低,但外固定肌腱断裂发生率较低。

相似文献

1
[Complications of open reduction and internal fixation versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis].[切开复位内固定与外固定治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折的并发症:一项荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Dec 20;96(47):3833-3837. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.47.014.
2
[Long-term efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis].切开复位内固定与外固定治疗不稳定桡骨远端骨折的长期疗效:一项荟萃分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 7;97(41):3269-3272. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.41.015.
3
Complications following open reduction and internal fixation versus external fixation in treating unstable distal radius fractures: Grading the evidence through a meta-analysis.切开复位内固定与外固定治疗不稳定桡骨远端骨折的并发症:通过荟萃分析对证据进行分级。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Feb;104(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
[Meta-analysis of external fixator and open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of distal radius fracture].[外固定架与切开复位内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的Meta分析]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 May 25;34(5):429-37. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.05.007.
5
Meta-analysis for dorsally displaced distal radius fracture fixation: volar locking plate versus percutaneous Kirschner wires.桡骨远端背侧移位骨折固定的荟萃分析:掌侧锁定钢板与经皮克氏针的比较
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul 15;10:108. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0252-2.
6
A meta-analysis of outcomes of external fixation versus plate osteosynthesis for unstable distal radius fractures.一项关于外固定与钢板接骨术治疗不稳定型桡骨远端骨折疗效的荟萃分析。
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Nov;30(6):1185-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.08.009.
7
[EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON OF EXTERNAL FIXATION AND VOLAR LOCKING COMPRESSION PLATE IN TREATMENT OF DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES OF TYPE C].[外固定架与掌侧锁定加压钢板治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;29(6):683-7.
8
Open reduction and internal fixation versus external fixation for unstable distal radial fractures: a meta-analysis.切开复位内固定与外固定治疗不稳定桡骨远端骨折的Meta 分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 May;99(3):321-31. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.018. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
9
Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radius fracture with a palmar locking-plate.采用掌侧锁定钢板治疗不稳定型桡骨远端骨折后的并发症
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 May;21(5):316-22. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318059b993.
10
Complications following dorsal versus volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture: a meta-analysis.桡骨远端骨折背侧与掌侧钢板固定术后并发症:一项荟萃分析。
J Int Med Res. 2013 Apr;41(2):265-75. doi: 10.1177/0300060513476438. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiographic Outcomes for Comminuted, Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures Treated with Primary Distraction Bridge Plate Fixation.采用一期撑开桥接钢板固定治疗的粉碎性关节内桡骨远端骨折的影像学结果
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Jan 6;57(4):543-551. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00812-3. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
What Is the Relative Effectiveness of the Various Surgical Treatment Options for Distal Radius Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.各种桡骨远端骨折手术治疗方法的相对有效性如何?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Feb 1;479(2):348-362. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001524.