Li Xinghui, Chen Zhiqiang, Zhang Yue, Zhang Hong, Niu Haiyan, Zheng Cheng, Jing Xiaoying, Qiao Hui, Wang Guanhua, Yang Wenjun
Cancer Institute of the General Hospital, School of Public Health and Management, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 16;13:1064790. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1064790. eCollection 2023.
Limited efforts have been made to evaluate the effect of multimodal chemotherapy on the survival of gastric cancer patients with liver metastases (LMGC). This study aimed to identify prognostic factors in LMGC patients and the superiority of multimodal chemotherapy with respect to overall survival (OS) in these patients.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1298 patients with M1 stage disease between January 2012 and December 2020. The effects of clinicopathological variables and preoperative chemotherapy (PECT), postoperative chemotherapy (POCT), and palliative chemotherapy on survival in patients with liver metastases (LM group) and non-liver metastases (non-LM group) were compared.
Of the 1298 patients analysed, 546 (42.06%) were in the LM group and 752 (57.94%) were in the non-LM group. The median (interquartile range) age was 60 (51-66) years. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the LM group were 29.3%, 13.9%, and 9.2%, respectively, and those in the non-LM group were. 38.2%, 17.4%, and 10.0%, respectively (P < 0.05, > 0.05, and > 0.05, respectively.) The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that palliative chemotherapy was a significant independent prognostic factor in both the LM and non-LM groups. Age ≥55 years, N stage, and Lauren classification were also independent predictors of OS in the LM group (P < 0.05). Palliative chemotherapy and POCT were associated with improved OS compared with PECT in the LM group (26.3% vs. 36.4% vs. 25.0%, P < 0.001).
LMGC patients had a worse prognosis than non- LMGC. Number of metastatic sites more than 1, liver and other metastatic sites, no CT treatment and HER2-negative had a poor prognosis. LMGC patient may benefit more from palliative chemotherapy and POCT than from PECT. Further well-designed, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
评估多模式化疗对伴有肝转移的胃癌患者(LMGC)生存的影响的研究较少。本研究旨在确定LMGC患者的预后因素以及多模式化疗在这些患者总生存期(OS)方面的优势。
我们对2012年1月至2020年12月期间1298例M1期疾病患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。比较了临床病理变量以及术前化疗(PECT)、术后化疗(POCT)和姑息化疗对肝转移患者(肝转移组)和无肝转移患者(非肝转移组)生存的影响。
在分析的1298例患者中,546例(42.06%)在肝转移组,752例(57.94%)在非肝转移组。中位(四分位间距)年龄为60(51 - 66)岁。肝转移组的1年、3年和5年总生存率分别为29.3%、13.9%和9.2%,非肝转移组分别为38.2%、17.4%和10.0%(P分别<0.05、>0.05和>0.05)。Cox比例风险模型显示,姑息化疗在肝转移组和非肝转移组中均为显著的独立预后因素。年龄≥55岁、N分期和Lauren分类也是肝转移组OS的独立预测因素(P<0.05)。与PECT相比,姑息化疗和POCT与肝转移组OS改善相关(26.3%对36.4%对25.0%,P<0.001)。
LMGC患者的预后比非LMGC患者差。转移部位数超过1个、肝及其他转移部位、未进行CT治疗和HER2阴性预后较差。LMGC患者可能从姑息化疗和POCT中比从PECT中获益更多。需要进一步设计良好的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。