Chen Lanyi Nora, Wei Alexander Z, Shu Catherine A
Division of Hematology & Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Hematology & Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave Fl 3, Herbert Irving Pavilion, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Mar 28;15:17588359231163798. doi: 10.1177/17588359231163798. eCollection 2023.
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has pushed the treatment paradigm for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) toward neoadjuvant therapy. A growing number of promising trials have examined the utility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, both alone and in combination with other modalities such as radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy. The phase II LCMC3 and NEOSTAR trials demonstrated a role for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in inducing meaningful pathologic responses, and another phase II trial established the feasibility of combining neoadjuvant durvalumab with RT. Significant interest in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy resulted in the conduct of multiple successful phase II trials including the Columbia trial, NADIM, SAKK 16/14, and NADIM II. Across these trials, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy led to high rates of pathologic response and improved surgical outcomes without compromising surgical timing or feasibility. CheckMate-816, which was a randomized phase III trial studying neoadjuvant nivolumab in addition to chemotherapy, definitively established a benefit for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone for resectable NSCLC. Despite the growing literature and success of these trials, several outstanding questions remain, including the relationship between pathologic response and patient survival, the role of biomarkers such as programmed death ligand 1 and circulating tumor DNA in determining patient selection and treatment course, and the utility of additional adjuvant therapies. Longer follow-up of CheckMate-816 and other ongoing phase III trials may help address these questions. Ultimately, the complexity of managing resectable NSCLC highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care.
免疫检查点抑制疗法的出现,已将可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗模式推向新辅助治疗。越来越多有前景的试验探讨了新辅助免疫疗法的效用,包括单独使用以及与放疗(RT)和化疗等其他方式联合使用。II期LCMC3和NEOSTAR试验证明了新辅助免疫疗法在诱导有意义的病理反应方面的作用,另一项II期试验确定了新辅助度伐利尤单抗与放疗联合使用的可行性。对新辅助化疗免疫疗法的浓厚兴趣促使开展了多项成功的II期试验,包括哥伦比亚试验、NADIM、SAKK 16/14和NADIM II。在这些试验中,新辅助化疗免疫疗法导致了高比例的病理反应,并改善了手术结果,同时不影响手术时机或可行性。CheckMate-816是一项随机III期试验,研究了除化疗外的新辅助纳武利尤单抗,明确证实了与单纯化疗相比,新辅助化疗免疫疗法对可切除NSCLC患者有益。尽管有越来越多的文献报道以及这些试验取得了成功,但仍存在几个悬而未决的问题,包括病理反应与患者生存之间的关系、程序性死亡配体1和循环肿瘤DNA等生物标志物在确定患者选择和治疗过程中的作用,以及其他辅助治疗的效用。对CheckMate-816和其他正在进行的III期试验进行更长时间的随访可能有助于解决这些问题。最终,可切除NSCLC管理的复杂性凸显了多学科方法在患者护理中的重要性。