• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力下的最佳状态:乳房组织扩张器对外力反应的分析

The Best Under Stress: An Analysis of Breast Tissue Expander Response to External Forces.

作者信息

Najafali Daniel, Liu Farrah C, Raman Karanvir, Maheta Bhagvat, Saldana Golddy Milagros, Heldman Lucas, Cevallos Priscila, Nazerali Rahim

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Feb 20;5:ojad018. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad018. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojad018
PMID:37008276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10063436/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of breast tissue expanders (TEs) in breast reconstruction is accompanied by undesired changes to the chest wall and lateral plane. Breast TEs are designed to create a naturally formed breast pocket by capitalizing on the ductile response of skin tissue; however, in practice, the use of expanders is accompanied by undesired changes to the chest wall and lateral plane.

OBJECTIVES

The authors of this study compared 3 comparably sized and commercially available breast TEs to assess the mechanical profile and functionality of each design.

METHODS

Authors compared MENTOR Artoura PLUS Smooth (Irvine, CA), Allergan 133 Smooth (Irvine, CA), and Sientra AlloX2 Smooth (Santa Barbara, CA) filled to 100% of their label volume. The mechanical profile of TEs was assessed via vertical compression. Dimensions were recorded at baseline and percent changes were calculated at each compressive load (5-35 lbf intervals of 5 lbf).

RESULTS

Base width and projection were recorded at compressive loads of 10, 20, and 35 lbs. For percent changes of base width, MENTOR had 0.98%, 2.09%, 3.84%; Allergan 4.21%, 9.15%, 15.52%; and Sientra 4.72%, 10.19%, 19.15%. For percent changes of projection, MENTOR had -19.06%, -25.44%, -30.88%, Allergan -35.53%, -42.90%, -50.09%, and Sientra -29.64%, -37.68%, -44.69%. For percent change of height, MENTOR had 1.44%, 2.62%, 4.27%, Allergan 10.26%, 16.49%, 22.97%, and Sientra 6.99%, 11.93%, 16.90%. MENTOR's TE had the most pronounced lower pole with volume expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

The MENTOR TE demonstrated the least lateral deformation and projection loss across the range of compressive loads, as well as the highest force resistance compared with the other models.

摘要

背景

在乳房重建中使用乳房组织扩张器(TEs)会伴随胸壁和外侧平面出现不良变化。乳房TEs旨在利用皮肤组织的延展性来创建自然形成的乳房腔隙;然而,在实际应用中,扩张器的使用会伴随胸壁和外侧平面出现不良变化。

目的

本研究的作者比较了3种尺寸相当且市售的乳房TEs,以评估每种设计的力学特性和功能。

方法

作者比较了填充至其标签容量100%的MENTOR Artoura PLUS Smooth(加利福尼亚州欧文市)、Allergan 133 Smooth(加利福尼亚州欧文市)和Sientra AlloX2 Smooth(加利福尼亚州圣巴巴拉市)。通过垂直压缩评估TEs的力学特性。在基线时记录尺寸,并在每个压缩负荷(5 - 35磅力,间隔5磅力)下计算百分比变化。

结果

在10、20和35磅的压缩负荷下记录底部宽度和突出度。对于底部宽度的百分比变化,MENTOR分别为0.98%、2.09%、3.84%;Allergan分别为4.21%、9.15%、15.52%;Sientra分别为4.72%、10.19%、19.15%。对于突出度的百分比变化,MENTOR分别为 - 19.06%、 - 25.44%、 - 30.88%,Allergan分别为 - 35.53%、 - 42.90%、 - 50.09%,Sientra分别为 - 29.64%、 - 37.68%、 - 44.69%。对于高度的百分比变化,MENTOR分别为1.44%、2.62%、4.27%,Allergan分别为10.26%、16.49%、22.97%,Sientra分别为6.99%、11.93%、16.90%。MENTOR公司的TE在体积扩张时具有最明显的下极。

结论

与其他型号相比,MENTOR公司的TE在整个压缩负荷范围内表现出最小的横向变形和突出度损失,以及最高的抗压力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/be52704299ba/ojad018f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/292db2dabebf/ojad018f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/573b93bbddc6/ojad018f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/7e1e8ca600c6/ojad018f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/b78e1b37ea24/ojad018f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/be52704299ba/ojad018f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/292db2dabebf/ojad018f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/573b93bbddc6/ojad018f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/7e1e8ca600c6/ojad018f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/b78e1b37ea24/ojad018f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/10063436/be52704299ba/ojad018f5.jpg

相似文献

1
The Best Under Stress: An Analysis of Breast Tissue Expander Response to External Forces.压力下的最佳状态:乳房组织扩张器对外力反应的分析
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Feb 20;5:ojad018. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad018. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.艾尔建、曼托和仙特拉轮廓状粘性凝胶乳房植入物的比较:一位外科医生的10年经验
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5):957-966. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001675.
3
Safety Profile Comparison of 2 Smooth Tissue Expander Types: Artoura and CPX4.两种平滑组织扩张器(Artoura和CPX4)的安全性概况比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Aug 1;93(2):178-182. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004019. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
4
Silicone gel breast implants: science and testing.硅胶乳房植入物:科学与测试。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jul;134(1 Suppl):47S-56S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000349.
5
Sientra AlloX2 Short-Term Case Study, Surgical Pearls, and Roundtable Discussion.Sientra AlloX2 短期案例研究、手术技巧和圆桌讨论。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):29S-39S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004352.
6
Effect of MRI on breast tissue expanders and recommendations for safe use.MRI对乳房组织扩张器的影响及安全使用建议。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Dec;70(12):1702-1707. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
7
Tissue Expander Overfilling: Achieving New Dimensions of Customization in Breast Reconstruction.组织扩张器过度填充:在乳房重建中实现定制化的新维度
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Feb 5;4(2):e612. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000594. eCollection 2016 Feb.
8
Managing Postoperative Infection following Breast Reconstruction with the Sientra AlloX2 Tissue Expander.使用Sientra AlloX2组织扩张器进行乳房重建术后感染的管理
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Dec 17;6(12):e2046. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002046. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction.基于扩张器的乳房重建中设备创新对临床结果的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Dec 24;7(12):e2524. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002524. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Two-stage expander implant reconstruction: recent experience.两阶段扩张器植入重建:近期经验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1429-1436. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818b89da.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to: Commentary on: The Best Under Stress: An Analysis of Breast Tissue Expander Response to External Forces.对《压力下的最佳表现:乳房组织扩张器对外力反应的分析》评论的回应
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 May 22;5:ojad044. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad044. eCollection 2023.
2
Commentary on: The Best Under Stress: An Analysis of Breast Tissue Expander Response to External Forces.关于《压力下的最佳表现:乳房组织扩张器对外力反应的分析》的评论
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Feb 23;5:ojad020. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad020. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective Comparison of FDA-Approved Breast Implant Products in the USA: 5-Year Update.美国 FDA 批准的乳房植入产品比较:5 年更新。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2568-2577. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02395-0. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
2
High-Efficiency Same-Day Approach to Breast Reconstruction During the COVID-19 Crisis.COVID-19 危机期间高效的当日乳房重建方法。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;182(3):679-688. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05739-7. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
3
The history and development of breast implants.乳房植入物的历史与发展。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Sep;102(7):478-482. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0003. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
SMS-Split Muscle Support: A Reproducible Approach for Breast Implant Stabilization.SMS-分离肌肉支撑:一种可重复的乳房植入物稳定方法。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Jun;44(3):698-705. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01565-5. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
5
New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants.乳房植入物多维机械应变和切线模量的新评估程序:与硅胶凝胶植入物相比的IDEAL IMPLANT结构化乳房植入物
Bioengineering (Basel). 2019 May 12;6(2):43. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering6020043.
6
Implant selection in the setting of prepectoral breast reconstruction.胸肌前乳房重建中的植入物选择
Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):36-42. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.11.09.
7
Strategies and considerations in selecting between subpectoral and prepectoral breast reconstruction.胸大肌下和胸大肌前乳房重建术选择中的策略与考量
Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):11-18. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.08.01.
8
Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.脱细胞真皮基质一期植入式乳房重建与两期乳房重建(BRIOS)后生活质量和患者满意度比较:一项随机对照试验的主要结局。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):1205-1214. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30378-4. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Perforator mapping reduces the operative time of DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography.穿支血管定位可缩短腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术的手术时间:术前超声、计算机断层扫描和磁共振血管造影的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Apr;71(4):468-477. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
10
Evolving Approaches to Tissue Expander Design and Application.组织扩张器设计与应用的不断发展的方法
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):23S-29S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003948.