Cianciolo Anna T, Ashburn Cheryl, Han Heeyoung, Schwind Cathy, Matos Sophia, Rafaquat Aysha, Davila Jasmine
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, PO Box 19681, IL 62794-9681 Springfield, USA.
Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, Provo, USA.
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Jan 25;33(1):205-214. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01739-6. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Inconsistent or superficial access to workplace learning experiences can impede medical students' development. Well-designed clerkship curricula provide comprehensive education by offering developmental opportunities in and out of the workplace, explicitly linked to competency objectives. Questions remain about how students engage with clerkship curriculum offerings and how this affects their achievement. This study investigated student engagement as the source of an apparent clerkship curriculum malfunction: increasing rate of substandard summative clinical competency exam (SCCX) performance over 3 years following curriculum reform.
We sampled from three cohorts of US medical students (classes of 2018-2020) based on their post-clerkship SCCX performance: substandard ( = 33) vs. exemplary ( = 31). Using a conceptually based, locally developed rubric, a five-person team rated students' engagement in a curriculum offering designed to provide standardized deliberate practice on the clerkship's competency objectives. We examined the association between engagement and SCCX performance, taking prior academic performance into account.
Rate of substandard SCCX performance could not be explained by cohort differences in prior academic performance. Student engagement differed across cohorts and was significantly associated with SCCX performance. However, engagement did not meaningfully predict individual students' SCCX performance, particularly in light of prior academic performance.
Engagement with a particular learning opportunity may not affect clerkship outcomes, but may reflect students' priorities when navigating curricular offerings, personal learning goals, and curriculum policy. Proposing four patterns of engagement in clerkship learning, this study prompts reflection on the complex interaction among factors that affect engagement and outcomes.
工作场所学习经历的获取不一致或流于表面会阻碍医学生的发展。精心设计的临床实习课程通过在工作场所内外提供与能力目标明确相关的发展机会,提供全面的教育。关于学生如何参与临床实习课程以及这如何影响他们的成绩,仍存在疑问。本研究调查了学生参与度,将其作为临床实习课程明显失灵的根源:课程改革后3年,不合格的总结性临床能力考试(SCCX)成绩的上升率。
我们根据美国医学生三个队列(2018 - 2020级)的临床实习后SCCX成绩进行抽样:不合格组(n = 33)与优秀组(n = 31)。一个五人团队使用基于概念、本地开发的评分标准,对学生参与一门旨在就临床实习能力目标提供标准化刻意练习的课程的情况进行评分。我们在考虑先前学业成绩的情况下,研究了参与度与SCCX成绩之间的关联。
先前学业成绩的队列差异无法解释不合格SCCX成绩的比率。不同队列的学生参与度存在差异,且与SCCX成绩显著相关。然而,参与度并不能有效预测个别学生的SCCX成绩,尤其是考虑到先前学业成绩时。
参与特定的学习机会可能不会影响临床实习结果,但可能反映学生在选择课程、个人学习目标和课程政策时的优先事项。本研究提出了临床实习学习中的四种参与模式,促使人们反思影响参与度和结果的因素之间的复杂相互作用。