Rabin J A
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Winter;10(4):729-47. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-4-729.
Some legal scholars propose that the right of privacy articulated by the United States Supreme Court should be extended to protect homosexual activity. In light of the advent of AIDS, should that extension include constitutional protection for homosexual men who frequent gay bathhouses? The author argues that although the government has the power to close the baths in the name of public health, it should not do so without careful and conscious balancing against the privacy rights infringed upon by its actions. Balancing the tension between public health policy and individual rights applies not only to the specific situation of the baths, but also to insurance companies' aim to test all single, young, male life and health policy applicants for exposure to the putative AIDS virus; to potential health department releases of names of those testing antibody-positive for HTLV-III; to the military's rumored plans to discharge all personnel suspected of having AIDS; and to school districts seeking to exclude children with AIDS.
一些法律学者提议,美国最高法院所阐明的隐私权应予以扩展,以保护同性恋行为。鉴于艾滋病的出现,这种扩展是否应包括对经常光顾同性恋澡堂的男性同性恋者的宪法保护呢?作者认为,尽管政府有权以公共健康之名关闭这些澡堂,但在未仔细且有意识地权衡其行动所侵犯的隐私权之前,不应这样做。权衡公共卫生政策与个人权利之间的紧张关系不仅适用于澡堂这一特定情形,也适用于保险公司对所有单身、年轻男性人寿及健康保险申请者进行艾滋病病毒检测的目的;适用于卫生部门可能公布的HTLV - III抗体检测呈阳性者的姓名;适用于军方据传要开除所有涉嫌感染艾滋病的人员的计划;以及适用于学区试图开除患有艾滋病的儿童的情况。