• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病患者改变健康行为的糖尿病赋权与动机特征:一项横断面调查

Characterizing Diabetes Empowerment and Motivation for Changing Health Behaviors Among People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

作者信息

Clark Callahan N, Eby Elizabeth L, Lensing Cody J, Fultz Elena, Hart Brian, Lingcaro Lilian, Hoffner Ron, Schloot Nanette C, Benneyworth Brian D

机构信息

Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.

Eli Lilly and Company, 1 Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2023 May;14(5):869-882. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01397-2. Epub 2023 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-023-01397-2
PMID:37010793
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10126189/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Effectively engaging people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) earlier in their health journeys is critical to prevent downstream complications. Digitally based diabetes programs are a growing component of care delivery that have the potential to engage individuals outside of traditional clinic-based settings and use personalized data to pair people to tailored diabetes self-management interventions. Knowing an individuals' diabetes empowerment and health-related motivation can help drive appropriate recommendations for personalized interventions. We aimed to characterize diabetes empowerment and motivation towards changing health behaviors among participants in Level2, a T2D specialty care organization in the USA that combines wearable technology with personalized clinical support.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among people enrolled in Level2 (February-March 2021). Distributions of respondent-reported diabetes empowerment and health motivation were analyzed using Motivation and Attitudes Toward Changing Health (MATCH) and Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (DES-SF) scales, respectively. Associations between MATCH and DES-SF scores with Level2 engagement measures and glycemic control were analyzed.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 1258 respondents with T2D (mean age 55.7 ± 8.4 years). Respondents had high average MATCH (4.19/5) and DES-SF (4.02/5) scores. The average MATCH subscores for willingness (4.43/5) and worthwhileness (4.39/5) were higher than the average ability subscore (3.73/5). Both MATCH and DES-SF scores showed very weak correlations with Level2 engagement measures and glycemic control (ρ = - 0.18-0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Level2 survey respondents had high average motivation and diabetes empowerment scores. Further research is needed to validate sensitivity of these scales to detect changes in motivation and empowerment over time and to determine whether differences in scores can be used to pair people to personalized interventions.

摘要

引言

在2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的健康旅程早期有效地吸引他们参与进来对于预防下游并发症至关重要。基于数字技术的糖尿病项目在医疗服务中所占比重日益增加,它有可能让个体在传统诊所环境之外参与进来,并利用个性化数据为人们匹配量身定制的糖尿病自我管理干预措施。了解个体的糖尿病自我效能感和健康相关动机有助于为个性化干预提供恰当的建议。我们旨在描述美国一家将可穿戴技术与个性化临床支持相结合的T2D专科护理机构Level2的参与者中,糖尿病自我效能感以及改变健康行为的动机。

方法

对Level2的注册人员(2021年2月至3月)进行了一项横断面在线调查。分别使用“改变健康的动机和态度”(MATCH)量表和糖尿病自我效能量表简版(DES-SF)分析了受访者报告的糖尿病自我效能感和健康动机的分布情况。分析了MATCH和DES-SF得分与Level2参与度指标和血糖控制之间的关联。

结果

最终分析纳入了1258名T2D受访者(平均年龄55.7±8.4岁)。受访者的MATCH(4.19/5)和DES-SF(4.02/5)平均得分较高。意愿(4.43/5)和价值感(4.39/5)的平均MATCH子得分高于平均能力子得分(3.73/5)。MATCH和DES-SF得分与Level2参与度指标和血糖控制均显示出非常弱的相关性(ρ=-0.18-0.19)。

结论

Level2的调查受访者平均动机和糖尿病自我效能感得分较高。需要进一步研究来验证这些量表检测动机和自我效能感随时间变化的敏感性,并确定得分差异是否可用于为人们匹配个性化干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/386c/10126189/7f2a504cc9cc/13300_2023_1397_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/386c/10126189/8d4379233959/13300_2023_1397_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/386c/10126189/7f2a504cc9cc/13300_2023_1397_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/386c/10126189/8d4379233959/13300_2023_1397_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/386c/10126189/7f2a504cc9cc/13300_2023_1397_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterizing Diabetes Empowerment and Motivation for Changing Health Behaviors Among People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Survey.2型糖尿病患者改变健康行为的糖尿病赋权与动机特征:一项横断面调查
Diabetes Ther. 2023 May;14(5):869-882. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01397-2. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
2
Psychometric properties of the Slovenian versions of the diabetes empowerment scale, long and short form, among the slovenian adults with type 2 diabetes.斯洛文尼亚语版糖尿病授权量表长、短式在斯洛文尼亚 2 型糖尿病成人中的心理测量学特性。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2024 Dec;18(6):660-668. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2024.10.002. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
3
Person-Centred Diabetes Care: Examining Patient Empowerment and Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life in Slovenian Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.以患者为中心的糖尿病护理:探究斯洛文尼亚成年2型糖尿病患者的自我赋权及糖尿病特异性生活质量
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;12(9):899. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090899.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Interplay among patient empowerment and clinical and person-centered outcomes in type 2 diabetes. The BENCH-D study.2型糖尿病患者赋权与以临床和患者为中心的结局之间的相互作用。BENCH-D研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Sep;98(9):1142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 May 21.
6
Empowerment and Knowledge as Determinants for Quality of Life: A Contribution to a Better Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management.赋权和知识是生活质量的决定因素:促进更好的 2 型糖尿病自我管理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;20(5):4544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054544.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
Does patient empowerment predict self-care behavior and glycosylated hemoglobin in chinese patients with type 2 diabetes?患者赋权是否能预测中国 2 型糖尿病患者的自我护理行为和糖化血红蛋白?
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 May;17(5):343-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0345. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
9
Do Perceptions of Empowerment Affect Glycemic Control and Self-Care Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes?对赋权的认知是否会影响2型糖尿病成年人的血糖控制和自我护理?
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Feb 24;7(5):80-90. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p80.
10
New Diabetic Treatment by Alleviation of Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction Measured as Periosteal Pressure Sensitivity at Sternum Improves Empowerment, Treatment Satisfaction, and Self-Reported Health of People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial.通过减轻以胸骨骨膜压力敏感性衡量的自主神经系统功能障碍进行的新型糖尿病治疗可改善2型糖尿病患者的赋权感、治疗满意度和自我报告的健康状况:一项随机试验。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Jun 19;17:2519-2531. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S455216. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between Health Interest Scale Dimensions and Obesity Risk: A Cross-sectional Study among Japanese Employees.健康兴趣量表维度与肥胖风险之间的关联:一项针对日本员工的横断面研究。
JMA J. 2025 Apr 28;8(2):453-464. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0388. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Person-Centred Diabetes Care: Examining Patient Empowerment and Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life in Slovenian Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.以患者为中心的糖尿病护理:探究斯洛文尼亚成年2型糖尿病患者的自我赋权及糖尿病特异性生活质量
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;12(9):899. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090899.

本文引用的文献

1
To support self-management for people with long-term conditions - The effect on shared decision-making, empowerment and coping after participating in group-learning sessions.支持长期病患者的自我管理 - 参与小组学习后对共同决策、赋权和应对的影响。
Nurs Open. 2022 Sep;9(5):2444-2453. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1261. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
2022 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.《2022年糖尿病自我管理教育与支持国家标准》
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2022 Feb;48(1):44-59. doi: 10.1177/26350106211072203. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.
改善人群健康:2022 年糖尿病医学护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S8-S16. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S001.
4
5. Facilitating Behavior Change and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.5. 促进行为改变和幸福感以改善健康结局:2022 年糖尿病医学护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S60-S82. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S005.
5
SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists: established and emerging indications.SGLT2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂:已确立和新兴的适应证。
Lancet. 2021 Jul 17;398(10296):262-276. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00536-5. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.美国成年人糖尿病治疗和控制的趋势,1999-2018 年。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.
7
Empowerment among adult patients with type 2 diabetes: age differentials in relation to person-centred primary care, community resources, social support and other life-contextual circumstances.2 型糖尿病成年患者的赋权:与以患者为中心的初级保健、社区资源、社会支持和其他生活环境情况相关的年龄差异。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 1;21(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10855-0.
8
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) in patients with type 2 diabetes.中文版 LMC 技能、信心和准备度指数(SCPI)在 2 型糖尿病患者中的信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01664-x.
9
Introduction: .引言:.
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S1-S2. doi: 10.2337/dc21-Sint.
10
Addressing Therapeutic Inertia in 2020 and Beyond: A 3-Year Initiative of the American Diabetes Association.应对2020年及以后的治疗惰性:美国糖尿病协会的一项为期三年的倡议。
Clin Diabetes. 2020 Oct;38(4):371-381. doi: 10.2337/cd20-0053.