• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用美国全国房地产价值数据集评估水质。

Valuing water quality in the United States using a national dataset on property values.

机构信息

Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.

The Natural Capital Project, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 11;120(15):e2210417120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210417120. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2210417120
PMID:37011190
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10104588/
Abstract

High-quality water resources provide a wide range of benefits, but the value of water quality is often not fully represented in environmental policy decisions, due in large part to an absence of water quality valuation estimates at large, policy relevant scales. Using data on property values with nationwide coverage across the contiguous United States, we estimate the benefits of lake water quality as measured through capitalization in housing markets. We find compelling evidence that homeowners place a premium on improved water quality. This premium is largest for lakefront property and decays with distance from the waterbody. In aggregate, we estimate that 10% improvement of water quality for the contiguous United States has a value of $6 to 9 billion to property owners. This study provides credible evidence for policymakers to incorporate lake water quality value estimates in environmental decision-making.

摘要

优质水资源带来广泛的效益,但在环境政策决策中,水质的价值往往没有得到充分体现,这在很大程度上是因为缺乏大规模、与政策相关的水质估值估算。我们利用全美范围内具有覆盖范围的房地产价值数据,通过住房市场的资本化来估算湖泊水质的效益。我们有确凿的证据表明,房主看重水质的改善。对于湖滨房产来说,这种溢价是最大的,并且随着与水体的距离的增加而衰减。总的来说,我们估计美国相邻地区水质改善 10%对房产所有者的价值为 60 亿至 90 亿美元。这项研究为决策者在环境决策中纳入湖泊水质价值估算提供了可信的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e13/10104588/266de6b5e2b4/pnas.2210417120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e13/10104588/8a1e8644684a/pnas.2210417120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e13/10104588/266de6b5e2b4/pnas.2210417120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e13/10104588/8a1e8644684a/pnas.2210417120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e13/10104588/266de6b5e2b4/pnas.2210417120fig02.jpg

相似文献

1
Valuing water quality in the United States using a national dataset on property values.利用美国全国房地产价值数据集评估水质。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 11;120(15):e2210417120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210417120. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
Environmental amenities of urban rivers and residential property values: A global meta-analysis.城市河流的环境宜人性与住宅物业价值:全球荟萃分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 25;693:133628. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133628. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
3
Using benefit transfer to estimate housing value increases from improved water clarity: A case study of lakes in Kosciusko County, Indiana.利用效益转移法估算因湖水清澈度改善而带来的住房价值增长:印第安纳州科修斯库县湖泊的案例研究
J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2024 Apr;60(2):363-379. doi: 10.1111/1752-1688.13196.
4
Property values, water quality, and benefit transfer: A nationwide meta-analysis.财产价值、水质与效益转移:一项全国性的荟萃分析。
Land Econ. 2022 Feb 1;98(2):191-218. doi: 10.3368/le.98.2.050120-0062r1.
5
Valuing the improvement of a decommissioned heritage site to a multifunctional water sensitive greenspace.重视将退役遗产地改造为多功能水敏感型绿地的改善工作。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jul 1;313:114908. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114908. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
6
Envisat MERIS and Sentinel-3 OLCI satellite lake biophysical water quality flag dataset for the contiguous United States.针对美国本土的Envisat MERIS和哨兵-3 OLCI卫星湖泊生物物理水质标志数据集。
Data Brief. 2019 Nov 16;28:104826. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104826. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Incentivizing the public to support invasive species management: eurasian milfoil reduces lakefront property values.激励公众支持入侵物种管理:欧亚水草降低湖滨房产价值。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e110458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110458. eCollection 2014.
8
Examining the economic impacts of hydropower dams on property values using GIS.利用地理信息系统研究水电大坝对房产价值的经济影响。
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jul;90 Suppl 3:S258-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.026. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
9
Perspectives on valuing water quality improvements using stated preference methods.使用意愿调查法评估水质改善的价值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 2;120(18):e2217456120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2217456120. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing.运用享乐定价法评估城市化地区文化生态系统服务的经济价值。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Dec 30;113:194-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.031. Epub 2012 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal drivers of water quality and phytoplankton communities in a cyanobacteria-dominated reservoir provide management insights.蓝藻主导型水库水质和浮游植物群落的时空驱动因素提供了管理见解。
Environ Monit Assess. 2025 Jun 24;197(7):795. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-14258-1.
2
You can bring plankton to fecal indicator organisms, but you cannot make the plankton graze: particle contribution to and MS2 inactivation in surface waters.你可以将浮游生物引入粪便指示生物,但不能让浮游生物摄食:颗粒对地表水中 和 MS2 病毒失活的贡献。
mSphere. 2024 Oct 29;9(10):e0065624. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00656-24. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Property values, water quality, and benefit transfer: A nationwide meta-analysis.财产价值、水质与效益转移:一项全国性的荟萃分析。
Land Econ. 2022 Feb 1;98(2):191-218. doi: 10.3368/le.98.2.050120-0062r1.
2
An Integrated Assessment Model for Valuing Water Quality Changes in the U.S.美国水质变化估值的综合评估模型
Land Econ. 2020 Nov 1;96(4):478-492. doi: 10.3368/wple.96.4.478.
3
A water rule that turns a blind eye to transboundary pollution.一项对跨界污染视而不见的水资源规则。
Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic Price Effects for Lake Water Quality.
湖泊水质享乐价格效应中的空间异质性
Land Econ. 2024 Feb;100(1):89-108. doi: 10.3368/le.100.1.102122-0086r.
4
Hedonic property values and water quality: A meta-analysis of commodity, market, and methodological choices.享乐属性价值与水质:商品、市场和方法选择的荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 14;352:119829. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119829. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
Science. 2021 Apr 16;372(6539):241-243. doi: 10.1126/science.abf8885.
4
High-resolution land value maps reveal underestimation of conservation costs in the United States.高分辨率土地价值图揭示了美国对保护成本的低估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 24;117(47):29577-29583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012865117. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
The low but uncertain measured benefits of US water quality policy.美国水质政策的收益虽低,但不确定。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5262-5269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802870115. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
6
Benefit Transfer Challenges: Perspectives from U.S. Practitioners.效益转移的挑战:美国从业者的观点
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2018;69(3):467-481. doi: 10.1007/s10640-017-0207-7.
7
LAGOS-NE: a multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of US lakes.LAGOS-NE:一个多尺度的地理空间和时间数据库,包含数千个美国湖泊的湖泊生态背景和水质信息。
Gigascience. 2017 Dec 1;6(12):1-22. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix101.
8
Deciphering dueling analyses of clean water regulations.解读关于清洁水法规的双重分析
Science. 2017 Oct 6;358(6359):49-50. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8023.
9
Challenges with secondary use of multi-source water-quality data in the United States.美国多源水质数据二次利用面临的挑战。
Water Res. 2017 Mar 1;110:252-261. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.024. Epub 2016 Dec 22.