• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

III 类面不对称患者近端节段角度改变后的手术稳定性。

Surgical Stability After Proximal Segment Angle Alteration in Patients With Class III Facial Asymmetry.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Assistant Professor, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Associate Professor, Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jun;81(6):734-745. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.002
PMID:37011882
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with facial asymmetry often seek improved symmetry in lower face contour resulting in transverse movement of the proximal segments. The study aimed to investigate the association between transverse change in the proximal segments and postoperative relapse after the surgical correction of skeletal Class III facial asymmetry.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study includes consecutive patients with skeletal Class III asymmetry who underwent 2-jaw orthognathic surgery. The primary predictor variable was ramus plane angle (RPA). The patients were grouped as small (S group, <4°) and large (L group, ≥4°) changes in RPA. The primary outcome was the positional change of B point, menton, and the intergonial width. Cone-beam computed tomography images were obtained before surgery (T0), 1 week after surgery (T1), and debond (T2). Intergroup comparison was conducted with independent t test. Correlations between the variables were estimated by Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

The study sample was composed of 60 subjects with 30 subjects in each study group. In the S group, the mean surgical changes of RPA were inward rotated 0.91° bilaterally. In the L group, the mean surgical changes of RPA were inward rotated 4.80° and 0.32° on the deviated and non-deviated side. After surgery, further minor inward adaptation of both sides was noted (<1 mm), and intergonial distance reduced with these changes in the proximal segments. By comparing the postsurgical stability between S and L group, the overall sagittal and vertical stability had no significant difference between 2 groups. However, the postsurgical transverse menton relapse (ΔMe in T2-T1) was significantly larger in L group (0.81 ± 1.40 mm) than S group (0.04 ± 1.32 mm) by 0.77 mm (P = .014).

CONCLUSION

Greater surgical changes in the proximal segments had minor clinical effect on transverse stability. Minor transverse overcorrection of 1 mm is recommended in cases with severe facial symmetry with extensive changes in the proximal segments.

摘要

目的

面部不对称的患者常寻求改善下面部轮廓的对称性,导致近段的横向移动。本研究旨在探讨近段横向变化与骨骼 III 类面部不对称手术矫正后术后复发的关系。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了接受双颌正颌手术的骨骼 III 类不对称连续患者。主要预测变量为下颌支平面角(RPA)。患者分为 RPA 小(S 组,<4°)和大(L 组,≥4°)变化组。主要结局是 B 点、颏点和下颌支间宽度的位置变化。术前(T0)、术后 1 周(T1)和去托槽(T2)时获取锥形束 CT 图像。采用独立 t 检验进行组间比较。采用 Pearson 相关分析估计变量间的相关性。

结果

研究样本由 60 名患者组成,每组 30 名患者。在 S 组中,双侧 RPA 的平均手术变化为向内旋转 0.91°。在 L 组中,RPA 的平均手术变化在偏侧和非偏侧分别为向内旋转 4.80°和 0.32°。术后,双侧进一步观察到较小的向内适应,近端节段的这些变化导致下颌支间距离缩小。通过比较 S 组和 L 组的术后稳定性,两组的总体矢状面和垂直面稳定性无显著差异。然而,L 组(0.81±1.40mm)的术后横向颏部复发(T2-T1 时的ΔMe)明显大于 S 组(0.04±1.32mm),差异为 0.77mm(P=0.014)。

结论

近段较大的手术变化对横向稳定性的临床影响较小。对于近端节段变化广泛且严重面部对称性的患者,建议进行 1mm 的轻度横向过矫正。

相似文献

1
Surgical Stability After Proximal Segment Angle Alteration in Patients With Class III Facial Asymmetry.III 类面不对称患者近端节段角度改变后的手术稳定性。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jun;81(6):734-745. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Condylar positional changes up to 12 months after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions.双颌手术治疗骨性III类错牙合畸形后12个月内髁突位置的变化。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):145-56. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.031. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
3
Improved lip esthetics in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry after isolated mandibular orthognathic surgery.孤立性下颌骨正颌手术后,骨骼 III 类错牙合和面部不对称患者的唇部美学改善。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 May;161(5):e407-e415. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
4
Transverse stability of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback surgery.双侧矢状劈开下颌骨后退截骨术后近段的横向稳定性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Aug;42(8):994-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.021. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
5
Adaptation of soft tissue following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in skeletal class III patients with facial asymmetry: A retrospective study.骨性 III 类错颌伴有面部不对称的双侧矢状劈开下颌骨截骨术后软组织的适应性:一项回顾性研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep;125(5S1):101941. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101941. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
6
The Accuracy and Stability of Intentional Change of Frontal-Ramal Inclination in Orthognathic Surgery for Facial Asymmetry Patients.正颌手术中面部不对称患者额支倾斜度有意改变的准确性和稳定性
J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(5):e462-e468. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009306. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
7
Three-Dimensional Changes in the Mandibular Proximal Segment After Using a Surgery-First Approach in Patients With Class III Malocclusion and Facial Asymmetry.手术优先治疗 III 类错颌伴面部不对称患者的下颌近中端三维变化
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Oct 1;33(7):1956-1961. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008520. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.一项关于不同类型下颌骨不对称骨性 III 类错颌患者上颌牙三维补偿特征的横断面研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):4973-4985. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05116-w. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
9
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Lip Asymmetry and Occlusal Cant Change After Two-Jaw Surgery.双颌手术后唇部不对称及咬合平面倾斜变化的三维分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Aug;78(8):1356-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
10
Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry?在III类面部不对称患者中,二维与三维手术模拟相比,哪种能产生更好的手术效果?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;47(8):1022-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating a modified proximal segment manipulation technique in sagittal split osteotomy for correcting facial asymmetry: outcomes and risk factors for Menton horizontal relapse.评估矢状劈开截骨术中改良近端节段操作技术矫正面部不对称的效果及颏部水平复发的危险因素。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 10;29(5):236. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06294-5.