• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估高危新生儿人群脐带夹闭实践的证据。

Evaluating the evidence behind umbilical cord clamping practices in at-risk neonatal populations.

机构信息

Pediatric Residency, Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine/Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.

Center for Perinatal Research, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Semin Perinatol. 2023 Jun;47(4):151745. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2023.151745. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.semperi.2023.151745
PMID:37012137
Abstract

Umbilical cord clamping practices impact nearly 140 million births each year. Current evidence has led professional organizations to recommend delayed cord clamping (DCC), as opposed to early cord clamping (ECC), as the standard of care in uncomplicated term and preterm deliveries. However, variability remains in cord management practices for maternal-infant dyads at higher risk of complications. This review examines the current state of evidence on the outcomes of at-risk infant populations receiving differing umbilical cord management strategies. Review of contemporary literature demonstrates members of high-risk neonatal groups, including those affected by small for gestational age (SGA) classification, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), maternal diabetes, and Rh-isoimmunization, are frequently excluded from participation in clinical trials of cord clamping strategies. Furthermore, when these populations are included, outcomes are often underreported. Consequently, evidence regarding optimal umbilical cord management in at-risk groups is limited, and further research is needed to guide best clinical practice.

摘要

脐带夹闭实践每年影响近 1.4 亿例分娩。目前的证据促使专业组织建议延迟脐带夹闭(DCC),而不是早期脐带夹闭(ECC),作为复杂足月和早产儿分娩的护理标准。然而,对于存在并发症风险的母婴对子,脐带管理实践仍然存在差异。本综述考察了目前接受不同脐带管理策略的高危婴儿人群的结局证据。对当代文献的回顾表明,高危新生儿群体的成员,包括那些受胎儿生长受限(IUGR)、母体糖尿病和 Rh 同种免疫影响的成员,经常被排除在脐带夹闭策略的临床试验之外。此外,当这些人群被包括在内时,结果往往报告不足。因此,关于高危人群最佳脐带管理的证据有限,需要进一步研究来指导最佳临床实践。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the evidence behind umbilical cord clamping practices in at-risk neonatal populations.评估高危新生儿人群脐带夹闭实践的证据。
Semin Perinatol. 2023 Jun;47(4):151745. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2023.151745. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Variations in umbilical cord clamping practices in the United States: a national survey of neonatologists.美国脐带夹闭实践的差异:一项对新生儿科医生的全国性调查。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Oct;35(19):3646-3652. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1836150. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Effects of delayed cord clamping in intrauterine growth-restricted neonates: a randomized controlled trial.延迟脐带夹闭对宫内生长受限新生儿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Jun;180(6):1701-1710. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-03959-7. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
4
Early versus delayed cord clamping in small for gestational age infants and iron stores at 3 months of age - a randomized controlled trial.小于胎龄儿早期与延迟脐带结扎及3月龄时铁储备情况——一项随机对照试验
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jul 18;18(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1214-8.
5
Maternal bleeding complications and neonatal outcomes following early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in cesarean deliveries for very low birthweight infants.剖宫产时早期与延迟夹闭脐带对极低出生体重儿产妇出血并发症和新生儿结局的影响。
J Perinatol. 2023 Jan;43(1):39-43. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01558-4. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
6
Premature infants receiving delayed cord clamping with and without cord milking: a randomized control trial.延迟结扎脐带并结合挤奶与不结合挤奶对早产儿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Mar 18;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03933-2.
7
Umbilical cord clamping time and maternal satisfaction.脐带夹闭时间与产妇满意度。
Midwifery. 2022 Dec;115:103487. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103487. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
8
Neonatal blood pressure before and after delayed umbilical cord clamping.新生儿延迟断脐前后的血压。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):5260-5264. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1876656. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
9
Umbilical cord milking and delayed cord clamping for the prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脐带血采集和延迟断脐预防新生儿低血糖症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06427-w.
10
Delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping for near-term infants born to preeclamptic mothers; a randomized controlled trial.延迟与早期断脐对子痫前期产妇足月新生儿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04831-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of cord management strategies in intrauterine growth-restricted infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.宫内生长受限婴儿脐带管理策略的评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 10;184(2):125. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05956-y.