Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Aug;50(8):1211-1226. doi: 10.1177/01461672231163645. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
Integrating insights from interdependence theory with the narcissistic admiration and rivalry concept, we propose that a pivotal obstacle for narcissistic leaders is their inability to sustain benevolent perceptions over time. As people strive to interpret social behavior in terms of self- or other-interest, the narcissistic tendency of prioritizing self-interests over the collective may become apparent and eventually taint their reputation as a leader. We examined how interpersonal motive perceptions-based on attributions of self- and other-interest-would clarify the leadership paradox of narcissism. We tracked 472 participants in 119 teams across four time-points. Narcissistic rivalry (but not admiration) corresponded to increasingly negative leader effectiveness ratings. The extent to which individuals were perceived as self-maximizing and lacking concern for other interests was tightly connected to declines in leader effectiveness across time. Altogether, these results offer insight into how perceived interpersonal motives may explain the downfall of narcissistic leadership.
我们将相互依存理论的洞见与自恋钦佩和竞争的概念相结合,提出自恋型领导者面临的一个关键障碍是,他们无法随着时间的推移维持对他人的仁慈看法。当人们努力从自身或他人利益的角度来解释社会行为时,自恋者将自身利益置于集体利益之上的倾向可能会显现出来,并最终损害他们作为领导者的声誉。我们研究了人际动机感知——基于对自身和他人利益的归因——如何阐明自恋型领导的悖论。我们在四个时间点上跟踪了 119 个团队中的 472 名参与者。自恋竞争(而非钦佩)与领导效能评价的下降呈正相关。个体被视为以自我为中心且不关心他人利益的程度与领导效能的下降密切相关。总的来说,这些结果为理解感知到的人际动机如何解释自恋型领导的垮台提供了线索。