Suppr超能文献

FDA 药品评价和研究中心新分子实体计划回顾:中期沟通中的趋势和监管要求。

Review of the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Program for New Molecular Entities: Trends and Regulatory Requirements in Mid-Cycle Communications.

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):689-701. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00511-7. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

Abstract

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implemented "the Program" in 2012 to promote greater transparency and increased communication between the FDA and applicants of New Molecular Entity (NME) New Drug Applications (NDA) and original Biologics License Applications (BLA). We examined 128 publicly available NME NDA and original BLA approval packages reviewed and approved under the Program with the goal to educate regulatory professionals about the content and timing of communications from FDA to the Sponsor. This research found that the timing of communications between FDA and the Sponsor through the Mid-Cycle Communication (MCC) was consistent with the 21st-century Desk Reference Guide (DRG); 90% of internal FDA Mid-Cycle Meetings, MCCs with the applicant, and corresponding issuance of MCC minutes were within the target date. The content and format of the MCC were also consistent with the DRG and across disciplines. Almost all MCCs reviewed included a discussion on significant review issues, including major safety concerns. FDA's preliminary opinion on the necessity of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), which was predictive of REMS requirement at approval. The FDA's MCC comment on advisory committee meeting plans was highly predictive; if the MCC indicated an AC was planned, an AC meeting was held 91% of the time. With respect to the MCC, this research found the DRG and relevant FDA Manual of Policies and Procedures to be reliable resources to predict the FDA's planned actions associated with the review of a NME NDA or original BLA.

摘要

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)于 2012 年实施了“该计划”,以促进 FDA 与新分子实体(NME)新药申请(NDA)和原始生物制品许可申请(BLA)的申请人之间的更大透明度和增加沟通。我们检查了 128 份公开的 NME NDA 和原始 BLA 批准文件,这些文件是根据该计划进行审查和批准的,目的是教育监管专业人员了解 FDA 与赞助商之间的沟通内容和时间安排。这项研究发现,通过中期沟通(MCC)在 FDA 和赞助商之间进行的沟通时间与 21 世纪的桌面参考指南(DRG)一致;90%的内部 FDA 中期会议、与申请人的 MCC 以及相应的 MCC 会议纪要的发布都在目标日期内。MCC 的内容和格式也与 DRG 和跨学科一致。几乎所有审查的 MCC 都包括对重大审查问题的讨论,包括主要安全问题。FDA 对风险评估和缓解策略(REMS)必要性的初步意见,这对批准时的 REMS 要求具有预测性。FDA 对咨询委员会会议计划的 MCC 评论具有高度预测性;如果 MCC 表明计划召开 AC,那么 91%的情况下都会召开 AC 会议。关于 MCC,这项研究发现,DRG 和相关的 FDA 政策和程序手册是可靠的资源,可以预测 FDA 与审查新分子实体 NDA 或原始 BLA 相关的计划行动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验