From the Department of Anesthesia, Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Humber River Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 2024 Feb 1;138(2):430-437. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006459. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
The incidence of failed spinal anesthesia varies widely in the obstetric literature. Although many risk factors have been suggested, their relative predictive value is unknown. The primary objective of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean deliveries at a tertiary care obstetric hospital, and its secondary objectives were to identify predictors of failed spinal anesthesia in the obstetrics population and quantify their relative importance in a predictive model for failure.
With local institutional ethics committee approval, a retrospective review of our hospital database identified the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia for 5361 cesarean deliveries between 2010 and 2019. We performed a multivariable analysis to assess the association of predictors with failure and a dominance analysis to assess the importance of each predictor.
The incidence of failed spinal anesthesia requiring an alternative anesthetic was 2.1%, with conversion to general anesthesia occurring in 0.7% of surgeries. Supplemental analgesia or sedation was provided to an additional 2.0% of women. The most important predictors of a failed spinal anesthetic were previous cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR], 11.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.09-18.20; P < .001), concomitant tubal ligation (OR, 8.23; 95% CI, 3.12-19.20; P < .001), lower body mass index (BMI) (kg·m -2 , OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98; P = .005), and longer surgery duration (minutes, OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P = .006). Previous cesarean delivery was the most significant risk factor, contributing to 9.6% of the total 17% variance predicted by all predictors examined.
Spinal anesthesia failed to provide a pain-free surgery in 4.1% of our cesarean deliveries. Previous cesarean delivery was the most important predictor of spinal failure. Other important predictors included tubal ligation, lower BMI, and longer surgery duration.
在产科文献中,脊髓麻醉失败的发生率差异很大。尽管已经提出了许多危险因素,但它们的相对预测价值尚不清楚。本回顾性队列研究的主要目的是确定三级产科医院行剖宫产术时脊髓麻醉失败的发生率,次要目的是确定产科人群中脊髓麻醉失败的预测因素,并量化其在失败预测模型中的相对重要性。
在获得当地机构伦理委员会批准的情况下,对我院数据库进行回顾性分析,确定 2010 年至 2019 年间 5361 例剖宫产术中脊髓麻醉失败的发生率。我们进行了多变量分析,以评估预测因素与失败的相关性,并进行优势分析,以评估每个预测因素的重要性。
脊髓麻醉失败需要改用其他麻醉的发生率为 2.1%,其中 0.7%的手术转为全身麻醉。另有 2.0%的女性需要额外的辅助镇痛或镇静。脊髓麻醉失败的最重要预测因素是既往剖宫产(比值比 [OR],11.33;95%置信区间 [CI],7.09-18.20;P<0.001)、同时行输卵管结扎术(OR,8.23;95%CI,3.12-19.20;P<0.001)、较低的体重指数(kg·m-2,OR,0.94;95%CI,0.90-0.98;P=0.005)和较长的手术时间(分钟,OR,1.02;95%CI,1.01-1.03;P=0.006)。既往剖宫产是最重要的危险因素,占所有预测因素总方差的 17%,其中 9.6%可归因于既往剖宫产。
在我们的剖宫产术中,4.1%的患者脊髓麻醉无法提供无痛手术。既往剖宫产是脊髓麻醉失败的最重要预测因素。其他重要的预测因素包括输卵管结扎术、较低的 BMI 和较长的手术时间。