Deinard A S, List A, Lindgren B, Hunt J V, Chang P N
J Pediatr. 1986 May;108(5 Pt 1):681-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)81041-1.
Eighteen- to 60-month-old iron-deficient anemic children given iron therapy (n = 25) and a control group matched for mother's educational level showed no significant difference in mean mental development score at baseline. The control group's mean score was increased significantly over baseline score at 3 and 6 months and was significantly higher than the experimental group's mean score at 3 months. Although the experimental group demonstrated hematologic correction over 6 months, mean mental development score showed no significant improvement. Scores for an iron deficient not anemic group given iron (n = 22), despite complete hematologic correction over the six months of observation, and for its control group, did not change significantly. Baseline scores for an iron-deficient not anemic placebo group (n = 23) and for its control group were not significantly different. At 3 months the control group score had increased significantly, whereas that for the experimental group had not. When experimental and control subjects were matched on baseline mental development score, the control subjects experienced increases in scores over time, further confirming an impaired ability to improve scores with repeated testing in the experimental groups. Behavioral rating data (responsiveness to examiner, responsiveness to environment, and emotional tone) revealed significant differences between the iron-deficient anemic group and its control group at 3 and 6 months, with the control group rated more responsive, suggesting that iron deficiency, alone or in association with anemia, may have some lasting effect on behavior and development. Group differences were also found between the mean number of occurrences of multiple stressful events. Failure to show improvement in scores in the iron-deficient anemic group may reflect the fact that those children were less testable than were children in the control group, despite repeated testings, a theory supported by the infant behavior rating data. This may be related to some irreversible behavioral deficit or to an adverse environmental milieu (e.g., stress).
接受铁剂治疗的18至60个月大缺铁性贫血儿童(n = 25)和根据母亲教育水平匹配的对照组在基线时的平均智力发育得分无显著差异。对照组的平均得分在3个月和6个月时较基线得分显著提高,且在3个月时显著高于试验组的平均得分。尽管试验组在6个月内实现了血液学纠正,但其平均智力发育得分未显示出显著改善。接受铁剂治疗的缺铁但不贫血组(n = 22)及其对照组,尽管在6个月的观察期内实现了完全的血液学纠正,但其得分并未显著变化。缺铁但不贫血安慰剂组(n = 23)及其对照组的基线得分无显著差异。3个月时,对照组得分显著提高,而试验组得分未提高。当试验组和对照组受试者根据基线智力发育得分进行匹配时,对照组受试者的得分随时间增加,进一步证实试验组在重复测试中提高得分的能力受损。行为评分数据(对检查者的反应性、对环境的反应性和情绪基调)显示,缺铁性贫血组与其对照组在3个月和6个月时存在显著差异,对照组的反应性更强,这表明缺铁单独或与贫血相关可能对行为和发育有一些持久影响。在多重应激事件发生的平均次数方面也发现了组间差异。缺铁性贫血组得分未显示出改善可能反映了这样一个事实,即尽管进行了多次测试,但这些儿童比对照组儿童更难以进行测试,婴儿行为评分数据支持了这一理论。这可能与某些不可逆转的行为缺陷或不良环境背景(如压力)有关。