• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定局部晚期宫颈癌近距离放射治疗中的差异。

Identifying disparities in brachytherapy delivery for locally advanced cervical cancer.

作者信息

Eakin Adam, Wairiri Loise, Stadtlander William, Bruegl Amanda, Emerson Jenna, Williamson Casey, Kahn Jenna

机构信息

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

出版信息

Brachytherapy. 2023 Jul-Aug;22(4):461-467. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2023.02.003
PMID:37015846
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer is concurrent chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a brachytherapy boost. Some studies show a decreased usage of brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients despite the standard of care and known survival advantage. This study aims to characterize the utilization of brachytherapy in Oregon and identify where disparities in treatment may exist.

METHODS

The Oregon State Cancer Registry database was used to identify patients diagnosed with FIGO Stage IB2-IVB cervical cancer between 2007 and 2016. Patients who received initial EBRT were categorized by whether they received brachytherapy boost or not. Age at diagnosis, county of patient residence, rural-urban status of the county, race/ethnicity, and insurance payer were studied using multivariable logistic regression to identify possible underserved populations. Survival data was compared using a Cox proportional hazard survival model.

RESULTS

401 patients who received primary EBRT for FIGO stage IB2-IVB cervical cancer were identified in the 10-year span. Breakdown by stage is: 16% stage IB2, 23.9% stage II, 37.4% stage III, and 22.7% stage IV. Of those, 154 (38.4%) received brachytherapy boost treatment, 75 (18.7%) received a different boost modality, and 42.9% received no boost. Stage IV (p = 0.001) and uninsured patients (p = 0.04) were significantly less likely to receive brachytherapy. Older age was also associated with decreased brachytherapy usage, as each additional year of life decreased brachytherapy receipt by 1.8% (p = 0.04). Native American and Pacific Islander patients were the only group significantly more likely to receive brachytherapy (p=0.003). There was no significant difference in the rate of brachytherapy boost identified based on urban/rural status of the county (p = 0.63 to 0.69), other racial/ethnic categories (p = 0.66 to 0.80), or among the other stages (p=0.45 to 0.63). In Cox proportional hazard survival analysis, patients that received brachytherapy showed a 42% reduction in risk of cancer specific mortality, though this did not reach the predetermined level of statistical significance (p = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

The brachytherapy boost rate among locally advanced cervical cancer patients was 38.4%. The data also indicated a likely reduction in cancer specific mortality in patients receiving brachytherapy. Older patients, stage IV patients, and uninsured patients were less likely to receive brachytherapy. Given the low overall brachytherapy usage, these data indicate access and delivery of brachytherapy care needs to be improved across the state. The increased brachytherapy use in the American Indian and Pacific Islander patient population should be further studied to identify facilitators to treatment completion and potentially extrapolate to other groups.

摘要

引言

局部晚期宫颈癌的标准治疗方案是同步化疗及外照射放疗(EBRT),随后进行近距离放疗加强剂量。一些研究表明,尽管有标准治疗方案且已知近距离放疗具有生存优势,但宫颈癌患者中近距离放疗的使用仍有所减少。本研究旨在描述俄勒冈州近距离放疗的使用情况,并确定可能存在治疗差异的地方。

方法

利用俄勒冈州癌症登记数据库确定2007年至2016年间被诊断为国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IB2-IVB期宫颈癌的患者。接受初始EBRT的患者根据是否接受近距离放疗加强剂量进行分类。使用多变量逻辑回归研究诊断时的年龄、患者居住县、县的城乡状况、种族/民族和保险支付方,以确定可能未得到充分服务的人群。使用Cox比例风险生存模型比较生存数据。

结果

在这10年期间,共确定了401例接受FIGO IB2-IVB期宫颈癌原发性EBRT的患者。各期分布为:IB2期占16%,II期占23.9%,III期占37.4%,IV期占22.7%。其中,154例(38.4%)接受了近距离放疗加强治疗,75例(18.7%)接受了不同的加强治疗方式,42.9%未接受加强治疗。IV期患者(p = 0.001)和未参保患者(p = 0.04)接受近距离放疗的可能性显著降低。年龄较大也与近距离放疗使用减少有关,每增加一岁,接受近距离放疗的可能性降低1.8%(p = 0.04)。美国原住民和太平洋岛民患者是唯一接受近距离放疗可能性显著更高的群体(p = 0.003)。根据县的城乡状况(p = 0.63至0.69)、其他种族/民族类别(p = 0.66至0.80)或其他分期(p = 0.45至0.63)确定的近距离放疗加强治疗率无显著差异。在Cox比例风险生存分析中,接受近距离放疗的患者癌症特异性死亡风险降低了42%,尽管这未达到预定的统计学显著性水平(p = 0.057)。

结论

局部晚期宫颈癌患者的近距离放疗加强治疗率为38.4%。数据还表明接受近距离放疗的患者癌症特异性死亡可能减少。老年患者、IV期患者和未参保患者接受近距离放疗的可能性较小。鉴于总体近距离放疗使用率较低,这些数据表明该州各地的近距离放疗护理的可及性和提供情况需要改善。美国印第安人和太平洋岛民患者群体中近距离放疗使用的增加应进一步研究,以确定促进治疗完成的因素,并可能推广到其他群体。

相似文献

1
Identifying disparities in brachytherapy delivery for locally advanced cervical cancer.确定局部晚期宫颈癌近距离放射治疗中的差异。
Brachytherapy. 2023 Jul-Aug;22(4):461-467. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
2
Better late than never: Brachytherapy is more important than timing in treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.亡羊补牢,为时未晚:近距离放疗在局部晚期宫颈癌治疗中的重要性优于时机。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Feb;164(2):348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
3
Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival.年龄增长预示着宫颈癌预后不良,进而影响治疗和总体生存。
Brachytherapy. 2019 Jan-Feb;18(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Underutilization of brachytherapy and disparities in survival for patients with cervical cancer in California.加利福尼亚州宫颈癌患者近距离放射治疗利用不足与生存差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jul;150(1):73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.563. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
5
Impact of marital status on receipt of brachytherapy and survival outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer.婚姻状况对局部晚期宫颈癌近距离放疗接受情况及生存结局的影响
Brachytherapy. 2019 Sep-Oct;18(5):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.04.273. Epub 2019 May 29.
6
Evaluation of sociodemographic and baseline patient characteristic differences in cervical cancer patients treated with either external beam or brachytherapy boost.评价接受外照射或近距离放疗加量治疗的宫颈癌患者的社会人口学和基线患者特征差异。
Brachytherapy. 2022 Jan-Feb;21(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
7
Racial disparities in brachytherapy administration and survival in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.种族差异与局部晚期宫颈癌女性近距离放射治疗及生存的关系。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.022. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
8
Updated Trends in the Utilization of Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer in the United States: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Study.美国宫颈癌近距离放疗利用的最新趋势:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 May 1;119(1):143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.007. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
9
Disparities in standard of care treatment and associated survival decrement in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.局部晚期宫颈癌患者在治疗标准及相关生存降低方面的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Nov;143(2):319-325. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
10
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.对局部晚期宫颈癌女性患者进行子宫切除术并辅以放疗或化疗或两者联合治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 7(4):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in brachytherapy in utilization for vaginal cancer in the United States from 2004 to 2021.2004年至2021年美国阴道癌近距离放射治疗的使用趋势。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Dec;191:228-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.014. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Disparities in Gynecologic Cancers.妇科癌症的差异。
Cancer J. 2023;29(6):343-353. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000678.