UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
California Cancer Registry, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jul;150(1):73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.563. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
The treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is external beam radiation (EBRT), concurrent chemotherapy, and brachytherapy (BT). We investigated demographic and socioeconomic factors that influence trends in BT utilization and disparities in survival.
Using the California Cancer Registry, cervical cancer patients FIGO IB2-IVA from 2004 to 2014 were identified. We collected tumor, demographic and socioeconomic (SES) factors. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine predictors of use of BT. Using Cox proportional hazards, we examined the impact of BT vs EBRT boost on cause specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS).
We identified 4783 patients with FIGO stage 11% IB2; 32% II, 54% III, 3% IVA. Nearly half (45%) of patients were treated with BT, 18% were treated with a EBRT boost, and 37% had no boost. Stage II and III were more likely to be treated with BT (p = 0.002 and p = 0.0168) vs Stage IB2. As patients aged, the use of BT decreased. Using multivariate analysis, BT impacted CCS (HR 1.16, p = 0.0330) and OS (HR 1.14, p = 0.0333). Worse CSS was observed for black patients (p = 0.0002), low SES (p = 0.0263), stage III and IVA (p < 0.0001. Black patients, low and middle SES had worse OS, (p = 0.0003).
The utilization of BT in locally advanced cervical cancer was low at 45%, with a decrease in CSS and OS. Black patients and those in low SES had worse CSS. As we strive for outcome improvement in cervical cancer, we need to target increasing access and disparities for quality and value.
局部晚期宫颈癌的治疗方法是外照射放疗(EBRT)、同期化疗和近距离放疗(BT)。我们研究了影响 BT 使用趋势和生存差异的人口统计学和社会经济因素。
使用加利福尼亚癌症登记处,确定了 2004 年至 2014 年 FIGO 分期为 IB2-IVA 的宫颈癌患者。我们收集了肿瘤、人口统计学和社会经济(SES)因素。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定 BT 使用的预测因素。使用 Cox 比例风险,我们检查了 BT 与 EBRT 增敏对特定原因(CSS)和总体生存(OS)的影响。
我们确定了 4783 名 FIGO 分期为 IB2 的患者,其中 11%为 II 期,32%为 III 期,54%为 III 期,3%为 IVA 期。近一半(45%)的患者接受了 BT 治疗,18%的患者接受了 EBRT 增敏治疗,37%的患者没有增敏治疗。II 期和 III 期患者更有可能接受 BT 治疗(p=0.002 和 p=0.0168)。随着患者年龄的增长,BT 的使用减少。使用多变量分析,BT 影响 CSS(HR 1.16,p=0.0330)和 OS(HR 1.14,p=0.0333)。黑人患者 CSS 较差(p=0.0002),社会经济地位较低(p=0.0263),III 期和 IVA 期患者(p<0.0001)。黑人患者、社会经济地位较低和中等的患者 OS 较差(p=0.0003)。
局部晚期宫颈癌 BT 的使用率较低,为 45%,导致 CSS 和 OS 下降。黑人患者和社会经济地位较低的患者 CSS 较差。在我们努力改善宫颈癌的结果时,我们需要针对提高获得高质量和高价值治疗的机会和减少差异。