• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔咖啡樱桃的微生物学:对可能影响咖啡质量的土著细菌的比较研究。

The microbiology of arabica and robusta coffee cherries: a comparative study of indigenous bacteria with presumptive impact on coffee quality.

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Jawa Timur, 65145, Indonesia.

Institute for the Development of Sustainable Agriculture, Malang, Jawa Timur 65152, Indonesia.

出版信息

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2023 Jan 17;370. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnad024.

DOI:10.1093/femsle/fnad024
PMID:37015877
Abstract

Arabica and robusta are the two major coffee beans being sold worldwide. It is well recognized that coffee quality is influenced by their origin and the microbiological activities that drive their fermentation. However, in many coffee plantations, information about the natural diversity of bacteria that inhabit the arabica and robusta coffee cherries is limited. Here, we sampled arabica and robusta coffee cherries from Malang, East Java, Indonesia, then sequenced and analysed their bacterial composition. We found that: (a) arabica cherries contained bacteria with less diversity and abundance compared with robusta; (b) both coffee cherries were heavily populated by extremophiles, presumably dispersed from volcanic activities; (c) groups known to be involved in coffee fermentation such as lactic acid bacteria, acetic acid bacteria, Enterobacteria, and soil-associated bacteria were present in both arabica and robusta coffee cherries, and (d) arabica cherries were dominated by Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides. These findings highlight that coffee cherry bacteria are highly diverse, the majority of which might come from the environment, with some potentially beneficial or detrimental to coffee quality. Knowledge of the natural microbial diversity of coffee cherries may be useful for the development of coffee fermentation technologies to yield coffee beans with consistent quality.

摘要

阿拉比卡(Arabica)和罗布斯塔(Robusta)是全球销售的两种主要咖啡豆。人们普遍认识到,咖啡的质量受到其产地和驱动其发酵的微生物活动的影响。然而,在许多咖啡种植园中,关于栖息在阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔咖啡樱桃中的细菌的自然多样性的信息是有限的。在这里,我们从印度尼西亚东爪哇的玛琅采集了阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔咖啡樱桃,然后对其细菌组成进行了测序和分析。我们发现:(a)与罗布斯塔相比,阿拉比卡樱桃中的细菌多样性和丰度较低;(b)这两种咖啡樱桃都深受极端微生物的影响,可能是由火山活动散布而来;(c)已知与咖啡发酵有关的群体,如乳酸菌、醋酸菌、肠杆菌和土壤相关细菌,存在于阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔咖啡樱桃中,(d)阿拉比卡樱桃主要由肠膜明串珠菌(Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides)主导。这些发现强调了咖啡樱桃细菌的高度多样性,其中大部分可能来自环境,其中一些可能对咖啡质量有益或有害。了解咖啡樱桃的自然微生物多样性可能有助于开发咖啡发酵技术,以生产具有一致质量的咖啡豆。

相似文献

1
The microbiology of arabica and robusta coffee cherries: a comparative study of indigenous bacteria with presumptive impact on coffee quality.阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔咖啡樱桃的微生物学:对可能影响咖啡质量的土著细菌的比较研究。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2023 Jan 17;370. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnad024.
2
Exploring the Impacts of Postharvest Processing on the Microbiota and Metabolite Profiles during Green Coffee Bean Production.探索采后加工对生咖啡豆生产过程中微生物群和代谢物谱的影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Dec 15;83(1). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02398-16. Print 2017 Jan 1.
3
Following Coffee Production from Cherries to Cup: Microbiological and Metabolomic Analysis of Wet Processing of Coffea arabica.从樱桃到杯子:咖啡果实湿法加工过程的微生物学和代谢组学分析。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Mar 6;85(6). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02635-18. Print 2019 Mar 15.
4
Homostachydrine (pipecolic acid betaine) as authentication marker of roasted blends of Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora (Robusta) beans.(哌可酸甜菜碱)homostachydrine 作为阿拉比卡咖啡和罗布斯塔咖啡(粗壮咖啡)烘焙混合物的鉴定标志物。
Food Chem. 2016 Aug 15;205:52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.154. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
5
Impact of drying surface and raking frequencies on mold incidence, ochratoxin A contamination, and cup quality during preparation of arabica and robusta cherries at the farm level.干燥表面和耙地频率对农场水平阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔樱桃制备过程中霉菌发生率、赭曲霉毒素 A 污染和杯质量的影响。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Nov;7(11):1435-40. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0575. Epub 2010 Jul 10.
6
Covering the different steps of the coffee processing: Can headspace VOC emissions be exploited to successfully distinguish between Arabica and Robusta?涵盖咖啡加工的不同步骤:能否利用顶空挥发性有机化合物(VOC)排放来成功区分阿拉比卡咖啡和罗布斯塔咖啡?
Food Chem. 2017 Dec 15;237:257-263. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.071. Epub 2017 May 17.
7
Impact of roasting on javamide-I/-II in Arabica and Robusta coffee beans.烘焙对阿拉比卡豆和罗布斯塔咖啡豆中 javamide-I/-II 的影响。
Food Chem. 2023 Jun 30;412:135586. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135586. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
8
Quantification of Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora var. robusta in roasted and ground coffee blends.定量分析烘焙研磨咖啡混合物中的阿拉伯咖啡(Coffea arabica)和粗壮咖啡(Coffea canephora var. robusta)。
Talanta. 2013 Mar 15;106:169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.12.003. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
9
Accurate Differentiation of Green Beans of Arabica and Robusta Coffee Using Nanofluidic Array of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Markers.利用单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 标记的纳流控阵列准确区分阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔咖啡豆。
J AOAC Int. 2020 Apr 1;103(2):315-324. doi: 10.1093/jaocint/qsz002.
10
Discrimination of green arabica and Robusta coffee beans by Raman spectroscopy.利用拉曼光谱法鉴别绿色阿拉比卡咖啡豆和罗布斯塔咖啡豆。
J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Nov 10;58(21):11187-92. doi: 10.1021/jf101999c. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Soil and cherry bacterial communities predict flavor on coffee farms.土壤和樱桃细菌群落可预测咖啡农场的风味。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 3;15(1):19387. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03665-6.
2
Unveiling the Microbial Signatures of Arabica Coffee Cherries: Insights into Ripeness Specific Diversity, Functional Traits, and Implications for Quality and Safety.揭示阿拉比卡咖啡樱桃的微生物特征:对成熟度特异性多样性、功能特性以及对质量和安全影响的见解。
Foods. 2025 Feb 12;14(4):614. doi: 10.3390/foods14040614.