Department of Clinical Chemistry, Graduate School of Health and Social Services, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, Japan.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Higashimatsuyama Medical Association Hospital, Higashimatsuyama, Japan.
Ann Clin Biochem. 2023 Sep;60(5):320-327. doi: 10.1177/00045632231170554. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
The bromocresol green (BCG) and bromocresol purple (BCP) methods are widely used for albumin measurements in routine testing, but the BCG method is known to react with globulin fractions and to have low specificity for albumin. We evaluated a calibration method using different concentrations of human serum albumin standards (two-point calibration BCG method) with the aim of reducing the effect of globulin fractions on the BCG method in patients with hypoalbuminemia.
In the two-point calibration BCG method, two concentrations of standard solutions and their calibration values are set based on the difference in albumin concentrations measured by the BCG method (BCG-HSA method) and the modified BCP (modified BCP-HSA method) calibrated with human serum albumin standard solution (HSA). Albumin concentrations were measured in 136 patient serum samples (healthy group: 52, hypoalbuminemic group: 84) by the two-point calibrated BCG method and compared with those obtained using the modified BCP-HSA method.
The mean albumin concentrations obtained using the two-point calibrated BCG and modified BCP-HSA methods were 39.18 ± 3.42 g/L and 39.37 ± 3.14 g/L (healthy group) and 26.20 ± 6.23 g/L and 26.23 ± 5.67 g/L (hypoalbuminemia group), respectively. The results of the two-point calibration BCG method were in a close agreement over the entire concentration range tested compared to the modified BCP-HSA method.
Based on these results, this calibration method reduces the influence of the globulin fraction on the BCG method. In the hypoalbuminemic group, the calibration method was shown to provide results consistent with the BCP method, which is highly specific for albumin.
溴甲酚绿(BCG)和溴甲酚紫(BCP)法广泛应用于常规检测中的白蛋白测定,但BCG 法已知与球蛋白部分反应,且对白蛋白特异性低。我们评估了一种使用不同浓度人血清白蛋白标准品的校准方法(两点校准 BCG 法),旨在减少低白蛋白血症患者中球蛋白部分对 BCG 法的影响。
在两点校准 BCG 法中,根据 BCG 法(BCG-HSA 法)和用人血清白蛋白标准溶液校准的改良 BCP(改良 BCP-HSA 法)测量的白蛋白浓度的差异,设定两个标准溶液浓度及其校准值。通过两点校准 BCG 法测量 136 例患者血清样本(健康组:52 例,低白蛋白血症组:84 例)的白蛋白浓度,并与改良 BCP-HSA 法的结果进行比较。
两点校准 BCG 和改良 BCP-HSA 方法的平均白蛋白浓度分别为 39.18 ± 3.42 g/L 和 39.37 ± 3.14 g/L(健康组)和 26.20 ± 6.23 g/L 和 26.23 ± 5.67 g/L(低白蛋白血症组)。与改良 BCP-HSA 法相比,两点校准 BCG 法在整个测试浓度范围内的结果均非常接近。
基于这些结果,该校准方法降低了球蛋白部分对 BCG 法的影响。在低白蛋白血症组中,该校准方法与高度特异白蛋白的 BCP 法提供的结果一致。