Garcia Moreira Vanessa, Beridze Vaktangova Nana, Martinez Gago Maria Dolores, Laborda Gonzalez Belen, Garcia Alonso Sara, Fernandez Rodriguez Eloy
Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Servicio de Analisis Clinicos, Hospital Universitario Cabueñes, Asturias, Spain.
Facultad de Enfermeria de Gijon, Universidad de Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
Lab Med. 2018 Oct 11;49(4):355-361. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmy020.
Usually serum albumin is measured with dye-binding assay as bromocresol green (BCG) and bromocresol purple (BCP) methods. The aim of this paper was to examine the differences in albumin measurements between the Advia2400 BCG method (AlbBCG), Dimension RxL BCP (AlbBCP) and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE).
Albumin concentrations from 165 serum samples were analysed using AlbBCG, AlbBCP and CZE. CZE was employed to estimate different serum protein fractions. Influence of globulins on albumin concentration discrepancies between methods was estimated as well as the impact of the albumin method on aCa concentrations. Medcalc was employed for statistical analysis, setting a value of P < 0.05 as significant.
Correlation of AlbBCG and AlbBCP was r = 0.948 (p < 0.0001), but mean difference was large. Bland-Altman plots showed greater bias at lower albumin concentrations. AlbBCG were positively biased versus CZE (3.54 g/L). There was good agreement between CZE and ALbBCP (< 1 g/L). The AlbBCG assay bias shows a good correlation with alpha-1-globulin concentrations (r = 0.758); moderate and weak correlations were observed with CRP (r = 0.729) and alpha-2-globulin (r = 0.585); we found no correlation with beta-globulin (r = 0.120) or gamma-globulin (r = -0.303). Mean aCa based on AlbBCG and AlbBCP methods were 2.34 ± 0.15 mmol/L and 2.46 ± 0.16 mmol/L (p < 0.01), with a mean BCG-BCP difference of -0.12.
Albumin results from the BCP and BCG methods may result in unacceptable differences and clinical confusion, especially at lower albumin concentrations. Serum acute phase proteins contribute to overestimating the albumin concentration using AlbBCG.
通常采用染料结合法如溴甲酚绿(BCG)法和溴甲酚紫(BCP)法测定血清白蛋白。本文旨在研究Advia2400 BCG法(AlbBCG)、Dimension RxL BCP法(AlbBCP)和毛细管区带电泳(CZE)在白蛋白测定方面的差异。
使用AlbBCG、AlbBCP和CZE分析165份血清样本中的白蛋白浓度。采用CZE估算不同的血清蛋白组分。评估球蛋白对不同方法间白蛋白浓度差异的影响以及白蛋白测定方法对校正钙(aCa)浓度的影响。使用Medcalc进行统计分析,将P < 0.05设定为具有显著性。
AlbBCG和AlbBCP的相关性为r = 0.948(p < 0.0001),但平均差异较大。Bland - Altman图显示在较低白蛋白浓度时偏差更大。AlbBCG相对于CZE存在正偏差(3.54 g/L)。CZE和ALbBCP之间具有良好的一致性(< 1 g/L)。AlbBCG测定偏差与α1球蛋白浓度具有良好的相关性(r = 0.758);与CRP(r = 0.729)和α2球蛋白(r = 0.585)观察到中度和弱相关性;与β球蛋白(r = 0.120)或γ球蛋白(r = -0.303)未发现相关性。基于AlbBCG和AlbBCP方法的平均aCa分别为2.34 ± 0.15 mmol/L和2.46 ± 0.16 mmol/L(p < 0.01),BCG - BCP平均差异为 -0.12。
BCP和BCG方法得出的白蛋白结果可能导致不可接受的差异和临床混淆,尤其是在较低白蛋白浓度时。血清急性期蛋白会导致使用AlbBCG高估白蛋白浓度。