• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少高级医学生评估中多项选择题的选项数量及其对考试心理测量学和干扰项功能的影响。

Decreasing the options' number in multiple choice questions in the assessment of senior medical students and its effect on exam psychometrics and distractors' function.

机构信息

School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

School of Medicine, Dundee University, Dundee, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 5;23(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04206-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04206-3
PMID:37016397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10072920/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies that have investigated the effect options' number in MCQ tests used in the assessments of senior medical students are scarce. This study aims to compare exam psychometrics between three- and five-option MCQ tests in final-year assessments.

METHODS

A cluster randomized study was applied. Participants were classified into three groups, according to their academic levels. Students in each of those levels were randomized into either the three- or five-option test groups.

RESULTS

Mean time to finish the five-option test was 45 min, versus 32 min for the three-option group. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 for the three-option group, versus 0.81 for the five-options, p-value = 0.19. The mean difficulty index for the three-option group was 0.75, compared to 0.73 for the five-option group, p-value = 0.57. The mean discriminating index was 0.53 for the three-option group, and 0.45 for the five-options, p-value = 0.07. The frequency of non-functioning distractors was higher in the five-option test, 111 (56%), versus 39 (39%) in the three-options, with p-value < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that three-option MCQs are comparable to five-option MCQs, in terms of exam psychometrics. Three-option MCQs are superior to five-option tests regarding distractors' effectiveness and saving administrative time.

摘要

背景

在评估高年级医学生的多项选择题(MCQ)测试中,研究选项数量的研究较少。本研究旨在比较终年级评估中三选项和五选项 MCQ 测试的考试心理计量学。

方法

应用了一项聚类随机研究。参与者根据其学术水平分为三组。每组中的学生被随机分配到三选项或五选项测试组。

结果

完成五选项测试的平均时间为 45 分钟,而三选项组为 32 分钟。三选项组的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.89,五选项组为 0.81,p 值=0.19。三选项组的平均难度指数为 0.75,五选项组为 0.73,p 值=0.57。三选项组的平均区分指数为 0.53,五选项组为 0.45,p 值=0.07。五选项测试中的无效干扰项频率较高,为 111 个(56%),而三选项组为 39 个(39%),p 值<0.01。

结论

本研究表明,在考试心理计量学方面,三选项 MCQ 与五选项 MCQ 相当。三选项 MCQ 在干扰项的有效性和节省行政时间方面优于五选项测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fd/10074863/fc0d651cbde6/12909_2023_4206_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fd/10074863/aaf841a3e6b7/12909_2023_4206_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fd/10074863/a47c1e5be171/12909_2023_4206_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fd/10074863/c022beb7f0cf/12909_2023_4206_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fd/10074863/fc0d651cbde6/12909_2023_4206_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fd/10074863/aaf841a3e6b7/12909_2023_4206_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fd/10074863/a47c1e5be171/12909_2023_4206_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fd/10074863/c022beb7f0cf/12909_2023_4206_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0fd/10074863/fc0d651cbde6/12909_2023_4206_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Decreasing the options' number in multiple choice questions in the assessment of senior medical students and its effect on exam psychometrics and distractors' function.减少高级医学生评估中多项选择题的选项数量及其对考试心理测量学和干扰项功能的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 5;23(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04206-3.
2
Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.针对质量参数的三选项、四选项和五选项多项选择题测试之间的比较:一项随机研究。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Sep-Oct;48(5):571-575. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.190757.
3
An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis.评估多选题中的干扰项的功能和非功能:描述性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jul 7;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-40.
4
Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.减少多项选择题的选项数量:反应时间、心理测量学和标准设定。
Med Educ. 2014 Oct;48(10):1020-7. doi: 10.1111/medu.12525.
5
Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚德布雷塔博尔大学运用项目反应理论确定医学实习资格考试多项选择题的质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 22;22(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03687-y.
6
Adding to the debate on the numbers of options for MCQs: the case for not being limited to MCQs with three, four or five options.增加对多选题选项数量的讨论:不限于三、四或五个选项的多选题的情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 14;19(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1801-x.
7
Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.使用自动试题生成来提高多项选择题干扰项的质量。
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):166-73. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146608.
8
Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items.项目分析:干扰项效率对多项选择题难度指数和区分度的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05433-y.
9
Comparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions.三选项和四选项选择题中干扰项质量的比较。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Apr 10;8:287-291. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S128318. eCollection 2017.
10
Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.具有无效干扰项的多项选择题的心理测量学:对医学教育的启示。
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015 Oct-Dec;59(4):428-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Postgraduate Clinical Residency: The Impact of Multiple-Choice Question Quality on Exam Success Rates.研究生临床住院医师培训:选择题质量对考试成功率的影响。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Aug 6;16:1381-1397. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S525828. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the Climate Readiness of Physician Education Leaders in Graduate Medical Education.评估毕业后医学教育中医生教育领导者的气候适应能力。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024 Oct 15;11(3):231-236. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2112. eCollection 2024 Fall.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple-Choice Item Distractor Development Using Topic Modeling Approaches.使用主题建模方法开发多项选择题干扰项
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 25;10:825. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00825. eCollection 2019.
2
Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.对大型一年级健康学院基础课程多项选择题及其干扰项使用情况的分析:评估从 5 选 1 变为 4 选 1 的效果。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 7;18(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1346-4.
3
Item statistics derived from three-option versions of multiple-choice questions are usually as robust as four- or five-option versions: implications for exam design.
源自多项选择题三选项版本的题目统计数据通常与四选项或五选项版本一样可靠:对考试设计的启示。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2018 Dec 1;42(4):565-575. doi: 10.1152/advan.00186.2016.
4
Comparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions.三选项和四选项选择题中干扰项质量的比较。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Apr 10;8:287-291. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S128318. eCollection 2017.
5
Evaluating the long-term impact of faculty development programs on MCQ item analysis.评估教师发展项目对多选题分析的长期影响。
Med Teach. 2017 Apr;39(sup1):S45-S49. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1254753. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
6
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
7
Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.针对质量参数的三选项、四选项和五选项多项选择题测试之间的比较:一项随机研究。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Sep-Oct;48(5):571-575. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.190757.
8
An investigation into the optimal number of distractors in single-best answer exams.关于单项最佳答案考试中干扰项最佳数量的调查。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Aug;21(3):571-85. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9652-7. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
9
Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.减少多项选择题的选项数量:反应时间、心理测量学和标准设定。
Med Educ. 2014 Oct;48(10):1020-7. doi: 10.1111/medu.12525.
10
A framework for improving the quality of multiple-choice assessments.提高选择题质量的框架。
Nurse Educ. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):98-104. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31825041d0.