Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Department of Dermatology, CHRU Tours, Tours, France.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2023 Jul 21;48(8):847-853. doi: 10.1093/ced/llad133.
Predatory journals, first recognized in the early 2000s, are fraudulent publications characterized by aggressive marketing solicitations and deviation from best publishing practices. These journals claim to be legitimate scholarly publications, and accept articles with no or poor peer review processes or quality checks, with rapid publication on payment by authors. They are a global threat as they are dishonest, lack transparency and seek only financial gain. More recently, predatory conferences have emerged and are expanding rapidly. Although they appear to be legitimate scientific conferences, they are also characterized by an overriding profit motive, with no concern for academic values. Predatory journals and conferences are on the rise; dermatology trainees, readers and those new to publishing and conferences are vulnerable to predatory exploitation. The consequences of falling victim to such predation include damage to the external reputation of the authors and their institution, and heightened concerns about the legitimacy of the research. This educational review defines predatory journals and conferences, and summarizes their distinguishing features such as a poor or no peer review process, rapid acceptance, flattering language and lack of meeting. It highlights the consequences of publishing in a predatory journal or attending a predatory conference, and outlines several tools available that dermatology researchers can use to recognize and reduce the likelihood of falling prey to a predatory journal or conference.
掠夺性期刊最早于 21 世纪初被发现,其特点是采取激进的市场推广手段,并背离了最佳出版规范。这些期刊自称是合法的学术出版物,接收无需同行评审或质量检查、付费即可快速发表的论文。它们是全球性的威胁,因为它们不诚实、缺乏透明度,只追求经济利益。最近,掠夺性会议也开始出现并迅速扩张。虽然这些会议表面上是合法的科学会议,但它们也以盈利为首要目的,毫不关心学术价值。掠夺性期刊和会议日益增多;皮肤科受训者、读者以及那些刚涉足出版和会议的人容易受到掠夺性剥削。遭受此类掠夺的后果包括作者及其所在机构的外部声誉受损,以及对研究合法性的担忧加剧。本教育综述定义了掠夺性期刊和会议,并总结了它们的一些特征,例如缺乏或不良的同行评审过程、快速接受、谄媚的语言和缺乏会议。它强调了在掠夺性期刊上发表文章或参加掠夺性会议的后果,并概述了皮肤科研究人员可以使用的几种工具,以识别和降低成为掠夺性期刊或会议目标的可能性。