Joo Dabin, Lee Jiwon, Jeong Doowon
College of Police and Criminal Justice, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea.
J Forensic Sci. 2023 May;68(3):856-870. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15240. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
Anti-forensic technology can play an effective role in protecting information, but it can make forensic investigations difficult. Specifically, file-wiping permanently erases evidence, making it challenging for investigators to determine whether a file ever existed and prolonging the investigation process. To address this issue, forensic researchers have studied anti-forensic techniques that detect file-wiping activities. Many previous studies have focused on the effects of file-wiping tools on $MFT, $LogFile, and $DATA, rather than on Windows artifacts. Additionally, previous studies that have examined Windows artifacts have considered different artifacts, making it difficult to study them in a comprehensive manner. To address this, we focused on analyzing traces in 13 Windows artifacts of 10 file-wiping tools' operations in the Windows operating system comprehensively. For our experiments, we installed each file-wiping tool on separate virtual machines and checked the traces that the tools left behind in each artifact. We then organized the results in a database format. Our analysis revealed that most of the tools left traces on other artifacts, except for JumpList, Open&SavePidlMRU, and lnk. There were also some cases where traces remained on the other three artifacts. Based on our research, forensic investigators can quickly identify whether a file-wiping tool has been used, and it can assist in decision-making for evidence collection and forensic triage.
